PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYJ vs. ROKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYJ vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYJ achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than ROKT's 46.55% return.


IYJ

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.44%
YTD
5.81%
6M
7.55%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
12.31%

ROKT

1D
-3.71%
1M
12.62%
YTD
46.55%
6M
60.20%
1Y
111.37%
3Y*
44.75%
5Y*
24.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYJ vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
5.81%11.94%17.82%19.94%-13.53%17.02%17.37%32.27%-9.28%
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
46.55%50.56%27.89%14.41%-0.81%4.63%7.99%40.90%-13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IYJ and ROKT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.81

The correlation between IYJ and ROKT shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYJ vs. ROKT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYJ
ROKT

Industrials

66.6%
67.6%

Financial Services

17.0%

-

Technology

6.6%
20.2%

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Utilities

3.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%

-

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Communication Services

-

5.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

6.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

IYJ
66.6%
ROKT
67.6%

Financial Services

IYJ
17.0%
ROKT

-

Technology

IYJ
6.6%
ROKT
20.2%

Basic Materials

IYJ
4.0%
ROKT

-

Utilities

IYJ
3.6%
ROKT

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYJ
1.7%
ROKT

-

Healthcare

IYJ
0.4%
ROKT

-

Communication Services

IYJ

-

ROKT
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

IYJ

-

ROKT

-

Energy

IYJ

-

ROKT
6.4%

Real Estate

IYJ

-

ROKT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYJ vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYJ
IYJ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ROKT
ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYJ vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYJROKTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

3.88

-3.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

4.47

-3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.57

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

9.82

-8.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.10

35.81

-31.70

IYJ vs. ROKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the ROKT Sharpe Ratio of 3.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYJ and ROKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYJROKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

3.88

-3.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

1.09

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.86

-0.49

Drawdowns

IYJ vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYJ drawdown since its inception was -61.97%, which is greater than ROKT's maximum drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYJ and ROKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYJROKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.97%

-43.16%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-11.40%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-23.46%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

-23.46%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.24%

-8.82%

+5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.21%

-6.75%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.12%

+0.02%

Volatility

IYJ vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) is 4.05%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a volatility of 13.10%. This indicates that IYJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYJROKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

13.10%

-9.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

24.98%

-13.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

28.89%

-13.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

22.78%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

25.14%

-5.27%

IYJ vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYJ has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ROKT's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYJ vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison

IYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than ROKT's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
0.78%0.83%0.88%1.05%1.05%0.76%1.01%1.32%1.43%1.29%1.38%1.53%
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
0.27%0.41%0.57%0.62%0.54%1.79%0.48%0.74%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYJ and ROKT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROKT has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to IYJ (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYJ dropped -61.97% vs ROKT's -43.16%.

On 5-year performance, ROKT leads with 24.68% vs 7.87% for IYJ. On fees, IYJ is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 24.68% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYJ is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ROKT.

IYJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.27% for ROKT.

IYJ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index, while ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYJ and 0.45% for ROKT.

ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYJ and ROKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer