IYJ vs. ROKT
IYJ (iShares U.S. Industrials ETF) and ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - IYJ tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index while ROKT tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IYJ returned 7.87%/yr vs 24.68%/yr for ROKT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IYJ charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ROKT.
Performance
IYJ vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYJ achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than ROKT's 46.55% return.
IYJ
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 12.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
ROKT
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 46.55%
- 6M
- 60.20%
- 1Y
- 111.37%
- 3Y*
- 44.75%
- 5Y*
- 24.68%
- 10Y*
- —
IYJ vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYJ iShares U.S. Industrials ETF | 5.81% | 11.94% | 17.82% | 19.94% | -13.53% | 17.02% | 17.37% | 32.27% | -9.28% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 46.55% | 50.56% | 27.89% | 14.41% | -0.81% | 4.63% | 7.99% | 40.90% | -13.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYJ and ROKT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IYJ and ROKT shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IYJ vs. ROKT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYJ
ROKT
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
IYJ
ROKT
Financial Services
IYJ
ROKT
-
Technology
IYJ
ROKT
Basic Materials
IYJ
ROKT
-
Utilities
IYJ
ROKT
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYJ
ROKT
-
Healthcare
IYJ
ROKT
-
Communication Services
IYJ
-
ROKT
Consumer Defensive
IYJ
-
ROKT
-
Energy
IYJ
-
ROKT
Real Estate
IYJ
-
ROKT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYJ vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank
IYJ
ROKT
IYJ vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYJ | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 3.88 | -3.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 4.47 | -3.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.57 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 9.82 | -8.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 35.81 | -31.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYJ | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 3.88 | -3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 1.09 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.86 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
IYJ vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYJ drawdown since its inception was -61.97%, which is greater than ROKT's maximum drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYJ and ROKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYJ | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.97% | -43.16% | -18.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -11.40% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -23.46% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.24% | -23.46% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -8.82% | +5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -6.75% | -4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.12% | +0.02% |
Volatility
IYJ vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) is 4.05%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a volatility of 13.10%. This indicates that IYJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYJ | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 13.10% | -9.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.88% | 24.98% | -13.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 28.89% | -13.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 22.78% | -4.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.87% | 25.14% | -5.27% |
IYJ vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYJ has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ROKT's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYJ vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison
IYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than ROKT's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYJ iShares U.S. Industrials ETF | 0.78% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.05% | 1.05% | 0.76% | 1.01% | 1.32% | 1.43% | 1.29% | 1.38% | 1.53% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.27% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYJ and ROKT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROKT has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to IYJ (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYJ dropped -61.97% vs ROKT's -43.16%.
On 5-year performance, ROKT leads with 24.68% vs 7.87% for IYJ. On fees, IYJ is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROKT has performed better with a 24.68% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYJ is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ROKT.
IYJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.27% for ROKT.
IYJ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index, while ROKT tracks S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYJ and 0.45% for ROKT.
ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYJ and ROKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer