PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IYH vs. UNHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IYH vs. UNHW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. IYH is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYH charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.

Performance

IYH vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYH achieves a -4.19% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 15.08% return.

IYH

1D
0.96%
1M
1.98%
YTD
-4.19%
6M
-4.54%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
8.96%

UNHW

1D
0.06%
1M
2.06%
YTD
15.08%
6M
11.60%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYH vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		-4.19%-0.37%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF		15.08%-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IYH and UNHW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.36

IYH vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IYH
UNHW

Healthcare

100.0%
33.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IYH
100.0%
UNHW
33.4%

Basic Materials

IYH

-

UNHW

-

Communication Services

IYH

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYH

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Defensive

IYH

-

UNHW

-

Energy

IYH

-

UNHW

-

Financial Services

IYH

-

UNHW

-

Industrials

IYH

-

UNHW

-

Real Estate

IYH

-

UNHW

-

Technology

IYH

-

UNHW

-

Utilities

IYH

-

UNHW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF

Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF

Often compared with IYH:
IYH vs. VHTIYH vs. XLVIYH vs. SPYIYH vs. IYEIYH vs. IFRAIYH vs. BMEDIYH vs. IBB
Often compared with UNHW:
UNHW vs. NERDUNHW vs. ARMWUNHW vs. VHTUNHW vs. BBCUNHW vs. MUUUNHW vs. XTAPUNHW vs. QTAP

Return for Risk

IYH vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
UNHW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYH vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IYHUNHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.89

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.43

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.97

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IYH vs. UNHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IYHUNHWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.50

-0.08

Drawdowns

IYH vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYH drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYH and UNHW.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IYHUNHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-32.28%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.36%

-7.06%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.96%

-12.48%

+3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

—

—

Volatility

IYH vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IYHUNHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

49.81%

-35.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

49.81%

-34.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

49.81%

-33.09%

IYH vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYH has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYH vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than UNHW's 17.33% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		1.30%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF		17.33%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IYH and UNHW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IYH is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IYH is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 17.33%, compared with 1.30% for IYH.

IYH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IYH and 0.99% for UNHW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYH and UNHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer