PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYF vs. IYZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYF vs. IYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYF achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than IYZ's 29.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IYF has outperformed IYZ with an annualized return of 13.53%, while IYZ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.94% annualized return.


IYF

1D
1.38%
1M
4.53%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
13.73%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
13.53%

IYZ

1D
1.27%
1M
0.83%
YTD
29.57%
6M
32.60%
1Y
58.27%
3Y*
28.37%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
5.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYF vs. IYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
-0.19%18.25%31.30%15.32%-11.33%31.60%-1.00%31.86%-9.39%19.58%
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
29.57%29.28%20.53%3.90%-30.29%11.69%4.13%16.14%-8.59%-11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IYF and IYZ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000

0.63

The correlation between IYF and IYZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYF vs. IYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYF
IYF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYF Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYF Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

IYZ
IYZ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYF vs. IYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYFIYZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.52

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

6.54

-5.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.38

25.99

-23.61

IYF vs. IYZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYF Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the IYZ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYF and IYZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYF vs. IYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYF drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, roughly equal to the maximum IYZ drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYF and IYZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYFIYZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.09%

-77.11%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-8.62%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

-13.85%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-39.74%

+14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.57%

-39.74%

-2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.25%

-4.77%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.59%

-40.10%

+22.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

2.17%

+2.96%

Volatility

IYF vs. IYZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) is 4.27%, while iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that IYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYFIYZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

8.76%

-4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.12%

15.61%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

18.65%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

18.88%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.90%

19.30%

+1.60%

IYF vs. IYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IYF and IYZ have an expense ratio of 0.42%.


Dividends

IYF vs. IYZ - Dividend Comparison

IYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than IYZ's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
1.49%1.32%1.29%1.67%1.86%1.27%1.72%1.64%1.90%1.46%1.67%1.66%
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
1.53%2.04%1.94%2.27%2.55%2.51%2.60%2.36%2.15%3.54%2.27%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYF and IYZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYZ has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to IYF (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYF dropped -79.09% vs IYZ's -77.11%.

On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.53% vs 5.94% for IYZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYF and IYZ have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.

IYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.49% for IYF.

IYF is categorized as Financials Equities, while IYZ is Communications Equities. IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, while IYZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index.

IYZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYF and IYZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer