IYE vs. HAP
IYE (iShares U.S. Energy ETF) and HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - IYE tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index while HAP tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYE returned 9.00%/yr vs 11.99%/yr for HAP. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.42% expense ratio.
Performance
IYE vs. HAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly higher than HAP's 21.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IYE has underperformed HAP with an annualized return of 9.00%, while HAP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.99% annualized return.
IYE
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 44.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 19.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
HAP
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 23.70%
- 1Y
- 46.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
IYE vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYE iShares U.S. Energy ETF | 31.90% | 7.33% | 6.06% | -2.21% | 60.21% | 53.42% | -33.49% | 10.03% | -19.37% | -1.80% |
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 21.49% | 34.91% | -4.08% | 2.46% | 7.84% | 25.04% | 6.30% | 18.60% | -10.68% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYE and HAP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2008 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IYE and HAP has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IYE vs. HAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYE
HAP
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
IYE
HAP
Technology
IYE
HAP
Basic Materials
IYE
-
HAP
Communication Services
IYE
-
HAP
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYE
-
HAP
Consumer Defensive
IYE
-
HAP
Financial Services
IYE
-
HAP
-
Healthcare
IYE
-
HAP
Industrials
IYE
-
HAP
Real Estate
IYE
-
HAP
Utilities
IYE
-
HAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYE vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank
IYE
HAP
IYE vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Energy ETF (IYE) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYE | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.56 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 5.65 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 23.05 | -12.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYE | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 3.14 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.63 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.61 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
IYE vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYE drawdown since its inception was -73.74%, which is greater than HAP's maximum drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYE and HAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYE | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.74% | -50.73% | -23.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -8.31% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.37% | -16.92% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -25.66% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.59% | -44.07% | -24.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.77% | -1.95% | -3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -12.03% | -7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 2.03% | +1.99% |
Volatility
IYE vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Energy ETF (IYE) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) at 4.37%. This indicates that IYE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYE | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 4.37% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 12.24% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.99% | 14.91% | +5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 18.24% | +7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.52% | 19.74% | +9.78% |
IYE vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IYE and HAP have an expense ratio of 0.42%.
Dividends
IYE vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison
IYE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than HAP's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.87% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
IYE iShares U.S. Energy ETF | 2.13% | 2.85% | 2.75% | 2.99% | 3.37% | 2.98% | 4.75% | 6.60% | 3.16% | 2.66% | 2.11% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYE and HAP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYE has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to HAP (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYE dropped -73.74% vs HAP's -50.73%.
On 10-year performance, HAP leads with 11.99% vs 9.00% for IYE. Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HAP has performed better with a 11.99% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYE and HAP have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.
IYE has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.87% for HAP.
IYE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck.
HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYE and HAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer