IYC vs. KLXY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY).
IYC and KLXY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IYC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2000. KLXY is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Luxury Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Sep 6, 2023. Both IYC and KLXY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IYC vs. KLXY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IYC vs. KLXY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -5.55% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 8.41% |
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF | -0.86% | 13.69% | -6.39% | 2.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly lower than KLXY's -0.86% return.
IYC
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- -5.55%
- 6M
- -6.87%
- 1Y
- 9.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
KLXY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 15.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IYC vs. KLXY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than KLXY's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IYC vs. KLXY — Risk / Return Rank
IYC
KLXY
IYC vs. KLXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYC | KLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 0.50 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 0.63 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | 2.48 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYC | KLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 0.50 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.15 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between IYC and KLXY is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IYC vs. KLXY - Dividend Comparison
IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than KLXY's 0.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
KLXY Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.84% | 0.74% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IYC vs. KLXY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, which is greater than KLXY's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and KLXY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYC | KLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.10% | -26.57% | -26.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -14.06% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.12% | -3.20% | -5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | -8.13% | -1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 4.07% | -0.29% |
Volatility
IYC vs. KLXY - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY) at 3.97%. This indicates that IYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IYC | KLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 3.97% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 12.89% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.10% | 23.28% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 20.80% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 20.80% | -0.95% |