PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXP vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXP vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXP achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.39% return.


IXP

1D
-1.03%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.33%
1Y
18.24%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
9.33%

FDVV

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.44%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXP vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXP
iShares Global Comm Services ETF
0.11%29.27%31.33%38.80%-33.40%12.77%22.16%25.23%-13.67%6.65%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
8.39%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IXP and FDVV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.66

The correlation between IXP and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXP vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXP
FDVV

Communication Services

97.7%
3.7%

Technology

2.0%
29.1%

Real Estate

0.5%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
13.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

11.0%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

17.0%

Healthcare

-

3.1%

Industrials

-

3.4%

Utilities

-

8.7%

Communication Services

IXP
97.7%
FDVV
3.7%

Technology

IXP
2.0%
FDVV
29.1%

Real Estate

IXP
0.5%
FDVV
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IXP
0.2%
FDVV
13.6%

Basic Materials

IXP

-

FDVV

-

Consumer Defensive

IXP

-

FDVV
11.0%

Energy

IXP

-

FDVV

-

Financial Services

IXP

-

FDVV
17.0%

Healthcare

IXP

-

FDVV
3.1%

Industrials

IXP

-

FDVV
3.4%

Utilities

IXP

-

FDVV
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXP vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXP
IXP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXP Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXP vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXPFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.53

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.21

10.54

-5.33

IXP vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXP Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXP and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXPFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.35

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.91

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.79

-0.45

Drawdowns

IXP vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXP drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXP and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXPFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-40.25%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-9.30%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-15.90%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.30%

-20.18%

-24.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-1.12%

-2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.92%

-3.81%

-8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

2.23%

+1.28%

Volatility

IXP vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.14%. This indicates that IXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXPFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

3.14%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

7.99%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

10.06%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

14.75%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

17.00%

+1.52%

IXP vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXP has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXP vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

IXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than FDVV's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.72%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%
IXP
iShares Global Comm Services ETF
2.98%2.98%1.35%1.24%0.62%1.80%0.95%2.18%4.32%3.41%4.02%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXP and FDVV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXP has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to FDVV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXP dropped -50.11% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 8.96% for IXP. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IXP.

IXP has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 2.72% for FDVV.

IXP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. IXP tracks S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IXP and 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXP and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer