PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXN vs. TRUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXN vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 41.18% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.


IXN

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.36%
YTD
41.18%
6M
41.72%
1Y
74.57%
3Y*
36.05%
5Y*
23.25%
10Y*
25.57%

TRUT

1D
-1.46%
1M
16.68%
YTD
25.30%
6M
24.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXN vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
41.18%12.21%
TRUT
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF
25.30%10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IXN and TRUT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXN vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

TRUT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXN vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXNTRUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.73

IXN vs. TRUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXNTRUTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

2.39

-1.85

Drawdowns

IXN vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and TRUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXNTRUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-18.55%

-37.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-1.46%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-5.17%

-6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

Volatility

IXN vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXNTRUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

21.53%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.84%

21.53%

+3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.40%

21.53%

+2.87%

IXN vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXN vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
0.74%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%
TRUT
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF
0.19%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IXN and TRUT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.

IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.13% for TRUT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXN and TRUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer