IXN vs. SLV
IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXN returned 25.57%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IXN charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IXN vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 41.18% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IXN has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 25.57%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.55% annualized return.
IXN
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.36%
- YTD
- 41.18%
- 6M
- 41.72%
- 1Y
- 74.57%
- 3Y*
- 36.05%
- 5Y*
- 23.25%
- 10Y*
- 25.57%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
IXN vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 41.18% | 25.25% | 24.84% | 52.98% | -29.86% | 29.58% | 43.62% | 47.88% | -5.44% | 41.23% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXN and SLV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.20 |
IXN vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXN
SLV
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IXN
SLV
-
Industrials
IXN
SLV
-
Energy
IXN
SLV
-
Healthcare
IXN
SLV
-
Real Estate
IXN
SLV
-
Basic Materials
IXN
-
SLV
Communication Services
IXN
-
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IXN
-
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
IXN
-
SLV
-
Financial Services
IXN
-
SLV
-
Utilities
IXN
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXN vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IXN
SLV
IXN vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXN | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.35 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.43 | 2.62 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.73 | 5.64 | +13.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXN | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41 | 1.89 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.58 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | 0.49 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.25 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
IXN vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXN | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -76.28% | +20.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -42.45% | +28.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.55% | -42.45% | +16.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.30% | -42.45% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | -42.81% | +6.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -37.30% | +36.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.27% | -44.67% | +33.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 19.67% | -15.68% |
Volatility
IXN vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is 7.95%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXN | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 16.30% | -8.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 58.31% | -40.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.98% | 58.90% | -36.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.84% | 36.15% | -11.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 31.84% | -7.44% |
IXN vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXN vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.74% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXN and SLV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IXN (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 25.57% vs 15.55% for SLV. On fees, IXN is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXN has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 25.57% return vs 15.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXN is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IXN is categorized as Technology Equities, while SLV is Silver. IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.50% for SLV.
IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXN and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer