PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXN vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXN vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 32.88% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IXN has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 25.29%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.


IXN

1D
-5.33%
1M
3.10%
YTD
32.88%
6M
32.08%
1Y
59.88%
3Y*
32.94%
5Y*
20.94%
10Y*
25.29%

SLV

1D
-5.40%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
69.08%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXN vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
32.88%25.25%24.84%52.98%-29.86%29.58%43.62%47.88%-5.44%41.23%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-13.49%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IXN and SLV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.20

The correlation between IXN and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (10 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXN vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXN vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXNSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.25

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

1.47

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

3.16

+10.90

IXN vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXN and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXN vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXNSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-76.28%

+20.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-47.23%

+33.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.55%

-47.23%

+21.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-47.23%

+10.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

-47.23%

+10.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.82%

-47.23%

+40.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-44.65%

+33.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

21.91%

-17.64%

Volatility

IXN vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV) have volatilities of 14.03% and 14.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXNSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.03%

14.34%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

59.27%

-37.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.21%

60.33%

-35.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

36.59%

-11.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.67%

32.09%

-7.42%

IXN vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXN vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
0.79%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXN and SLV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to IXN (14.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 25.29% vs 12.68% for SLV. On fees, IXN is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXN has been the lower-risk option at 14.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 25.29% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXN is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IXN is categorized as Technology Equities, while SLV is Silver. IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.50% for SLV.

IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXN and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer