IXN vs. PSI
IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXN returned 25.03%/yr vs 34.59%/yr for PSI. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IXN charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
IXN vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 112.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IXN has underperformed PSI with an annualized return of 25.03%, while PSI has yielded a comparatively higher 34.59% annualized return.
IXN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 33.08%
- 6M
- 35.17%
- 1Y
- 62.93%
- 3Y*
- 32.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 25.03%
PSI
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 9.80%
- YTD
- 112.90%
- 6M
- 110.54%
- 1Y
- 207.41%
- 3Y*
- 55.80%
- 5Y*
- 32.57%
- 10Y*
- 34.59%
IXN vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 33.08% | 25.25% | 24.84% | 52.98% | -29.86% | 29.58% | 43.62% | 47.88% | -5.44% | 41.23% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 112.90% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -11.55% | 40.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXN and PSI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IXN and PSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
IXN vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXN
PSI
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IXN
PSI
Industrials
IXN
PSI
Energy
IXN
PSI
-
Healthcare
IXN
PSI
-
Real Estate
IXN
PSI
-
Basic Materials
IXN
-
PSI
-
Communication Services
IXN
-
PSI
-
Consumer Cyclical
IXN
-
PSI
-
Consumer Defensive
IXN
-
PSI
-
Financial Services
IXN
-
PSI
-
Utilities
IXN
-
PSI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXN vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
IXN
PSI
IXN vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXN | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.63 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.39 | 12.90 | -8.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 45.29 | -30.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXN vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXN | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -62.96% | +7.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -15.48% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.55% | -41.07% | +15.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.30% | -44.85% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | -44.85% | +8.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.68% | 0.00% | -6.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -15.92% | +4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 4.40% | -0.19% |
Volatility
IXN vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is 12.01%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 18.89%. This indicates that IXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXN | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | 18.89% | -6.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.45% | 33.67% | -13.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 40.58% | -16.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 38.44% | -13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 35.42% | -10.84% |
IXN vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXN vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than PSI's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.78% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXN and PSI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to IXN (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs PSI's -62.96%.
On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 34.59% vs 25.03% for IXN. On fees, IXN is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXN has been the lower-risk option at 12.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 34.59% return vs 25.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXN is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.
IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.
IXN is categorized as Technology Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.56% for PSI.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXN and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer