PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXN vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXN vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 41.18% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IXN has outperformed IAU with an annualized return of 25.57%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively lower 13.31% annualized return.


IXN

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.36%
YTD
41.18%
6M
41.72%
1Y
74.57%
3Y*
36.05%
5Y*
23.25%
10Y*
25.57%

IAU

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.98%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXN vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
41.18%25.25%24.84%52.98%-29.86%29.58%43.62%47.88%-5.44%41.23%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
2.98%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IXN and IAU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005

0.07

The correlation between IXN and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXN vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXN
IAU

Technology

99.3%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IXN
99.3%
IAU

-

Industrials

IXN
0.2%
IAU

-

Energy

IXN
0.1%
IAU

-

Healthcare

IXN
0.1%
IAU

-

Real Estate

IXN
0.0%
IAU
100.0%

Basic Materials

IXN

-

IAU

-

Communication Services

IXN

-

IAU

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXN

-

IAU

-

Consumer Defensive

IXN

-

IAU

-

Financial Services

IXN

-

IAU

-

Utilities

IXN

-

IAU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXN vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXN vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXNIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.24

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

1.69

+3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.73

4.19

+14.55

IXN vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXN Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXN and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXNIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

1.23

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

1.03

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.84

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.62

-0.08

Drawdowns

IXN vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXNIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-45.14%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-19.18%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.55%

-19.18%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-20.93%

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

-21.82%

-14.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-17.70%

+16.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-15.96%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

7.71%

-3.72%

Volatility

IXN vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 5.50%. This indicates that IXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXNIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

5.50%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.85%

23.02%

-5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

26.42%

-4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.84%

17.95%

+6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.40%

15.90%

+8.50%

IXN vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXN vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
0.74%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXN and IAU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXN has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to IAU (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 25.57% vs 13.31% for IAU. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IAU has been the lower-risk option at 5.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 25.57% return vs 13.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.

IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

IXN is categorized as Technology Equities, while IAU is Gold. IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.25% for IAU.

IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXN and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer