IXN vs. GGTL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) and GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IXN is passively managed, while GGTL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IXN returned 32.94%/yr vs 21.46%/yr for GGTL. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXN charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GGTL.

Performance

IXN vs. GGTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 32.88% return, which is significantly higher than GGTL's 23.84% return.

IXN

• 1D: -5.33%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 32.88%
• 6M: 32.08%
• 1Y: 59.88%
• 3Y*: 32.94%
• 5Y*: 20.94%
• 10Y*: 25.29%

GGTL

• 1D: -4.64%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 23.84%
• 6M: 23.84%
• 1Y: 40.67%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXN vs. GGTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF	32.88%	25.25%	24.84%	52.98%	-29.74%
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	23.84%	19.78%	11.07%	18.17%	-16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IXN and GGTL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2022	0.75

The correlation between IXN and GGTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXN vs. GGTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IXN	GGTL
Technology	99.3%	55.5%
Industrials	0.1%	0.1%
Energy	0.1%	-
Healthcare	0.1%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IXN vs. GGTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXN

IXN Risk / Return Rank: 75
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 77

GGTL

GGTL Risk / Return Rank: 76
GGTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
GGTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GGTL Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GGTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GGTL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXN vs. GGTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IXN	GGTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.10	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.75	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.39	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	4.44	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.06	15.15	-1.09

IXN vs. GGTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the GGTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXN and GGTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IXN vs. GGTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than GGTL's maximum drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and GGTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IXN	GGTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.67%	-23.65%	-32.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.80%	-9.20%	-4.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.55%	-21.46%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.82%	-4.64%	-2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.26%	-7.40%	-3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	2.69%	+1.58%

Volatility

IXN vs. GGTL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a higher volatility of 14.03% compared to Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) at 11.18%. This indicates that IXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IXN	GGTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.03%	11.18%	+2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.54%	16.84%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.21%	19.45%	+5.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.45%	18.19%	+7.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.67%	18.19%	+6.48%

IXN vs. GGTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than GGTL's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXN vs. GGTL - Dividend Comparison

IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than GGTL's 0.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	0.84%	1.04%	0.75%	0.84%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF	0.79%	1.04%	0.43%	0.55%	0.81%	0.58%	0.63%	1.06%	0.94%	0.93%	1.03%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IXN and GGTL in my portfolio?

IXN and GGTL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IXN or GGTL?

IXN has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to GGTL (11.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs GGTL's -23.65%.

Which ETF is better, IXN or GGTL?

On 3-year performance, IXN leads with 32.94% vs 21.46% for GGTL. On fees, IXN is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, GGTL has been the lower-risk option at 11.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IXN or GGTL?

Over the 3-year period, IXN has performed better with a 32.94% return vs 21.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IXN or GGTL?

IXN is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IXN or GGTL?

GGTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.79% for IXN.

What is the main difference between IXN and GGTL?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.90% for GGTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.