IXJ vs. TRUH
IXJ (iShares Global Healthcare ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. IXJ is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. IXJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
IXJ vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IXJ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 21.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.37%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.06M | $16.61M | $23.38M | |
| $23.58K | $32.63K | $24.16K |
IXJ vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | 7.01% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXJ and TRUH is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXJ vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
IXJ
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXJ vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXJ | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXJ vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXJ drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXJ and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXJ | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -4.51% | -36.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -2.75% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.90% | -1.64% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | — | — |
Volatility
IXJ vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXJ | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 17.62% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 17.62% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 17.62% | -1.88% |
IXJ vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXJ vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
IXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | 1.44% | 1.40% | 1.50% | 1.38% | 1.17% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.42% | 2.11% | 1.46% | 1.73% | 2.85% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, IXJ and TRUH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXJ.
IXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXJ and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for IXJ and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer