PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXJ vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXJ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXJ achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IXJ has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 7.66%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


IXJ

1D
0.39%
1M
0.34%
YTD
-5.26%
6M
-4.88%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
7.66%

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXJ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
-5.26%14.99%0.55%3.62%-4.94%19.60%12.74%23.23%2.83%20.44%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IXJ and SLV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.18

IXJ vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXJ
SLV

Healthcare

98.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IXJ
98.9%
SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

IXJ
0.5%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

IXJ

-

SLV
100.0%

Communication Services

IXJ

-

SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXJ

-

SLV

-

Energy

IXJ

-

SLV

-

Financial Services

IXJ

-

SLV

-

Industrials

IXJ

-

SLV

-

Real Estate

IXJ

-

SLV

-

Technology

IXJ

-

SLV

-

Utilities

IXJ

-

SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXJ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXJ
IXJ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXJ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXJSLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.89

-1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

2.07

-1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.35

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

2.62

-1.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.11

5.64

-3.53

IXJ vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXJ and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXJSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.89

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.58

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.49

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.25

+0.17

Drawdowns

IXJ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXJ drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXJ and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXJSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-76.28%

+35.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-42.45%

+31.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-42.45%

+24.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

-42.45%

+24.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.35%

-42.81%

+15.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.27%

-37.30%

+28.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-44.67%

+37.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

19.67%

-15.26%

Volatility

IXJ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) is 3.75%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXJSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

16.30%

-12.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

58.31%

-48.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

58.90%

-44.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

36.15%

-21.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

31.84%

-16.17%

IXJ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXJ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXJ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
1.47%1.40%1.50%1.38%1.17%1.12%1.27%1.42%2.11%1.46%1.73%2.85%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXJ and SLV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IXJ (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXJ dropped -40.60% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 7.66% for IXJ. On fees, IXJ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXJ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IXJ is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SLV is Silver. IXJ tracks S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXJ and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXJ and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer