IXG vs. PEX
IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) and PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IXG tracks the S&P Global Financials Sector Index while PEX tracks the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXG returned 13.25%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for PEX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXG charges 0.46%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for PEX.
Performance
IXG vs. PEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly higher than PEX's -13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IXG has outperformed PEX with an annualized return of 13.25%, while PEX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.62% annualized return.
IXG
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 19.12%
- 3Y*
- 24.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
PEX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -14.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
IXG vs. PEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 5.10% | 28.54% | 25.69% | 14.97% | -8.97% | 25.07% | -2.99% | 24.60% | -16.33% | 23.78% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.80% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXG and PEX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.63 |
The correlation between IXG and PEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IXG vs. PEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXG
PEX
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IXG
PEX
Technology
IXG
PEX
-
Industrials
IXG
PEX
Energy
IXG
PEX
-
Healthcare
IXG
PEX
Consumer Cyclical
IXG
PEX
-
Basic Materials
IXG
-
PEX
Communication Services
IXG
-
PEX
-
Consumer Defensive
IXG
-
PEX
-
Real Estate
IXG
-
PEX
-
Utilities
IXG
-
PEX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXG vs. PEX — Risk / Return Rank
IXG
PEX
IXG vs. PEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXG | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.86 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | -0.60 | +2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | -1.13 | +7.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXG vs. PEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than PEX's maximum drawdown of -49.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and PEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXG | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.42% | -49.17% | -29.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -24.72% | +13.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.54% | -24.72% | +11.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | -36.58% | +9.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.47% | -49.17% | +5.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -22.09% | +21.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.71% | -8.26% | -11.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 13.06% | -9.86% |
Volatility
IXG vs. PEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is 4.15%, while ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that IXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXG | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 5.26% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 13.47% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 15.93% | -2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 17.99% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 19.30% | +0.64% |
IXG vs. PEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PEX's 3.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXG vs. PEX - Dividend Comparison
IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than PEX's 13.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 2.26% | 2.04% | 2.64% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 13.01% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXG and PEX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to IXG (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXG dropped -78.42% vs PEX's -49.17%.
On 10-year performance, IXG leads with 13.25% vs 4.62% for PEX. On fees, IXG is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXG has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXG has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXG is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 2.26% for IXG.
IXG tracks S&P Global Financials Sector Index, while PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXG and 3.13% for PEX.
IXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXG and PEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer