IXG vs. KBWD
IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) and KBWD (Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IXG tracks the S&P Global Financials Sector Index while KBWD tracks the KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXG returned 13.08%/yr vs 4.81%/yr for KBWD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXG charges 0.46%/yr vs 5.39%/yr for KBWD.
Performance
IXG vs. KBWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than KBWD's -2.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IXG has outperformed KBWD with an annualized return of 13.08%, while KBWD has yielded a comparatively lower 4.81% annualized return.
IXG
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 19.80%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- 14.29%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
KBWD
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- 6M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- -2.73%
- 1Y
- -0.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
IXG vs. KBWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 9.32% | 28.54% | 25.69% | 14.97% | -8.97% | 25.07% | -2.99% | 24.60% | -16.33% | 23.78% |
KBWD Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF | -2.73% | 5.59% | 4.30% | 20.21% | -19.14% | 31.89% | -15.58% | 20.72% | -8.70% | 12.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXG and KBWD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2010 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IXG and KBWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IXG vs. KBWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXG
KBWD
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IXG
KBWD
Technology
IXG
KBWD
-
Industrials
IXG
KBWD
-
Energy
IXG
KBWD
-
Healthcare
IXG
KBWD
-
Consumer Cyclical
IXG
KBWD
-
Basic Materials
IXG
-
KBWD
-
Communication Services
IXG
-
KBWD
-
Consumer Defensive
IXG
-
KBWD
-
Real Estate
IXG
-
KBWD
Utilities
IXG
-
KBWD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXG vs. KBWD — Risk / Return Rank
IXG
KBWD
IXG vs. KBWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXG | KBWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.01 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | -0.03 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.19 | -0.07 | +6.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXG vs. KBWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than KBWD's maximum drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and KBWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXG | KBWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.42% | -58.63% | -19.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -15.05% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.54% | -19.65% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | -30.74% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.47% | -58.63% | +15.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.64% | +9.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -7.43% | -12.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 6.82% | -3.62% |
Volatility
IXG vs. KBWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is 3.49%, while Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that IXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXG | KBWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 4.03% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 12.50% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 15.67% | -1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 19.80% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 23.24% | -3.38% |
IXG vs. KBWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than KBWD's 5.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXG vs. KBWD - Dividend Comparison
IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than KBWD's 14.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 2.18% | 2.04% | 2.64% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% |
KBWD Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF | 14.08% | 12.83% | 12.45% | 11.45% | 11.32% | 7.26% | 9.68% | 8.63% | 9.47% | 8.77% | 8.68% | 8.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXG and KBWD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBWD has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to IXG (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXG dropped -78.42% vs KBWD's -58.63%.
On 10-year performance, IXG leads with 13.08% vs 4.81% for KBWD. On fees, IXG is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXG has performed better with a 13.08% return vs 4.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXG is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 5.39% for KBWD.
KBWD has the higher dividend yield at 14.08%, compared with 2.18% for IXG.
IXG tracks S&P Global Financials Sector Index, while KBWD tracks KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXG and 5.39% for KBWD.
IXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXG and KBWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer