IXG vs. AAUM
IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) and AAUM (Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. IXG is passively managed, while AAUM is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXG charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AAUM.
Performance
IXG vs. AAUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than AAUM's -18.98% return.
IXG
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 12.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
AAUM
- 1D
- -5.40%
- 1M
- -6.59%
- YTD
- -18.98%
- 6M
- -14.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXG vs. AAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | -0.23% | 4.99% |
AAUM Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF | -18.98% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXG and AAUM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXG vs. AAUM — Risk / Return Rank
IXG
AAUM
IXG vs. AAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXG | AAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXG | AAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | -0.94 | +1.18 |
Drawdowns
IXG vs. AAUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than AAUM's maximum drawdown of -28.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and AAUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXG | AAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.42% | -28.24% | -50.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -23.44% | +20.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.75% | -11.98% | -7.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility
IXG vs. AAUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXG | AAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 27.52% | -13.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 27.52% | -10.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 27.52% | -7.40% |
IXG vs. AAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AAUM's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXG vs. AAUM - Dividend Comparison
IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than AAUM's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUM Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF | 0.93% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 2.05% | 2.04% | 2.64% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXG and AAUM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IXG is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IXG is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AAUM.
IXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.93% for AAUM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Tema ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXG and 0.75% for AAUM.
Find the right allocation for IXG and AAUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer