AAUM vs. PSCF
AAUM (Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF) and PSCF (Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. AAUM is actively managed, while PSCF is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAUM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCF.
Performance
AAUM vs. PSCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAUM achieves a -15.70% return, which is significantly lower than PSCF's 7.37% return.
AAUM
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -15.70%
- 6M
- -11.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCF
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.93%
AAUM vs. PSCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAUM Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF | -15.70% | 1.19% |
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 7.37% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUM and PSCF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAUM vs. PSCF — Risk / Return Rank
AAUM
PSCF
AAUM vs. PSCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAUM | PSCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.38 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
AAUM vs. PSCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUM drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, smaller than the maximum PSCF drawdown of -45.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUM and PSCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUM | PSCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.24% | -45.46% | +17.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.34% | -2.02% | -18.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.03% | -8.59% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.73% | — |
Volatility
AAUM vs. PSCF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAUM | PSCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.91% | 17.56% | +10.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.91% | 22.50% | +5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.91% | 24.80% | +3.11% |
AAUM vs. PSCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAUM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAUM vs. PSCF - Dividend Comparison
AAUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than PSCF's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUM Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF | 0.89% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 2.36% | 2.09% | 2.48% | 3.32% | 2.93% | 1.83% | 3.57% | 4.27% | 4.21% | 2.26% | 3.01% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAUM and PSCF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AAUM.
PSCF has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.89% for AAUM.
They also come from different issuers: Tema ETFs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AAUM and 0.29% for PSCF.
Find the right allocation for AAUM and PSCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer