PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXC vs. XOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXC vs. XOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 34.71% return, which is significantly lower than XOP's 41.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has outperformed XOP with an annualized return of 10.52%, while XOP has yielded a comparatively lower 5.00% annualized return.


IXC

1D
0.63%
1M
14.55%
6M
19.17%
YTD
34.71%
1Y
43.29%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
22.34%
10Y*
10.52%
ALL TIME*
8.52%

XOP

1D
1.45%
1M
15.38%
6M
27.63%
YTD
41.76%
1Y
41.65%
3Y*
10.13%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
5.00%
ALL TIME*
2.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$40.96M$62.51M$57.88M
$553.31M$544.38M$598.08M

IXC vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
34.71%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
41.76%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and XOP is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.88

The correlation between IXC and XOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXC vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXC
XOP

Energy

99.5%
95.1%

Utilities

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

4.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

2.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.6%

Energy

IXC
99.5%
XOP
95.1%

Utilities

IXC
0.2%
XOP

-

Basic Materials

IXC

-

XOP
4.3%

Communication Services

IXC

-

XOP

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXC

-

XOP

-

Consumer Defensive

IXC

-

XOP

-

Financial Services

IXC

-

XOP

-

Healthcare

IXC

-

XOP

-

Industrials

IXC

-

XOP
2.2%

Real Estate

IXC

-

XOP

-

Technology

IXC

-

XOP
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXC vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IXC vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXCXOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.26

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

5.48

+3.30

IXC vs. XOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the XOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and XOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXC vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and XOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXCXOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-90.27%

+22.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

-18.50%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-34.98%

+15.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-34.98%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-82.61%

+18.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-33.74%

+30.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.42%

-42.56%

+25.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

7.67%

-2.72%

Volatility

IXC vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is 6.07%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that IXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXCXOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

8.28%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.03%

22.52%

-6.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.61%

28.49%

-8.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.37%

33.53%

-10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.82%

40.15%

-13.33%

IXC vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXC vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than XOP's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.82%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.83%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXC and XOP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOP has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to IXC (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs XOP's -90.27%.

On 10-year performance, IXC leads with 10.52% vs 5.00% for XOP. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXC has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.83% for XOP.

IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.35% for XOP.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and XOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer