PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXC vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXC vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 30.67% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 10.03%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.


IXC

1D
1.00%
1M
3.26%
YTD
30.67%
6M
30.15%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
19.39%
10Y*
10.03%

GDX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-8.28%
6M
0.10%
1Y
53.51%
3Y*
37.89%
5Y*
17.28%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
30.67%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-8.28%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and GDX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2006

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between IXC and GDX has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IXC vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXC
GDX

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

IXC
100.0%
GDX

-

Basic Materials

IXC

-

GDX
100.0%

Communication Services

IXC

-

GDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXC

-

GDX

-

Consumer Defensive

IXC

-

GDX

-

Financial Services

IXC

-

GDX

-

Healthcare

IXC

-

GDX

-

Industrials

IXC

-

GDX

-

Real Estate

IXC

-

GDX

-

Technology

IXC

-

GDX

-

Utilities

IXC

-

GDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXC vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXCGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.22

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

1.68

+3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.26

4.32

+9.94

IXC vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXCGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.16

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.47

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.35

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.12

+0.20

Drawdowns

IXC vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXCGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-80.34%

+12.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-32.09%

+22.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-32.09%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-46.51%

+21.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-49.79%

-14.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.96%

-32.09%

+26.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-40.43%

+22.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

12.42%

-9.16%

Volatility

IXC vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is 6.55%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 16.05%. This indicates that IXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXCGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

16.05%

-9.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.51%

38.61%

-23.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.79%

46.36%

-27.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.52%

36.61%

-13.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

37.27%

-10.42%

IXC vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXC vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than GDX's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.80%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.82%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXC and GDX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to IXC (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 12.82% vs 10.03% for IXC. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.80% for GDX.

IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while GDX is Gold. IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXC and 0.51% for GDX.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer