PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXC vs. ESPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXC vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 30.67% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -14.87% return.


IXC

1D
1.00%
1M
3.26%
YTD
30.67%
6M
30.15%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
19.39%
10Y*
10.03%

ESPO

1D
0.10%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
-14.87%
6M
-18.35%
1Y
-15.00%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
30.67%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-17.74%
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
-14.87%25.79%47.61%33.64%-34.71%-2.13%83.93%42.36%-12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and ESPO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.26

The correlation between IXC and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXC vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXC
ESPO

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

78.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

8.2%

Utilities

-

-

Energy

IXC
100.0%
ESPO

-

Basic Materials

IXC

-

ESPO

-

Communication Services

IXC

-

ESPO
78.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IXC

-

ESPO
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

IXC

-

ESPO

-

Financial Services

IXC

-

ESPO

-

Healthcare

IXC

-

ESPO

-

Industrials

IXC

-

ESPO

-

Real Estate

IXC

-

ESPO

-

Technology

IXC

-

ESPO
8.2%

Utilities

IXC

-

ESPO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXC vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXCESPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.88

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

-0.54

+5.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.26

-0.96

+15.22

IXC vs. ESPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the ESPO Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and ESPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXCESPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

-0.80

+3.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.24

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.62

-0.30

Drawdowns

IXC vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and ESPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXCESPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-50.99%

-16.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-27.81%

+18.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-27.81%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-48.33%

+23.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.96%

-26.99%

+21.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-15.05%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

15.58%

-12.32%

Volatility

IXC vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.84%. This indicates that IXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXCESPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

4.84%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.51%

14.65%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.79%

18.85%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.52%

25.11%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

25.74%

+1.11%

IXC vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXC vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than ESPO's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
1.46%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.82%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXC and ESPO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to ESPO (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs ESPO's -50.99%.

On 5-year performance, IXC leads with 19.39% vs 5.88% for ESPO. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IXC has performed better with a 19.39% return vs 5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.46% for ESPO.

IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXC and 0.55% for ESPO.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and ESPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer