PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWX vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWX vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.


IWX

1D
1.25%
1M
2.38%
YTD
16.33%
6M
15.40%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
12.38%

WNTR

1D
6.51%
1M
45.64%
YTD
17.65%
6M
21.49%
1Y
115.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWX vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IWX and WNTR is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWX vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWX
IWX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWX vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWXWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.33

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

2.73

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.23

6.99

+12.24

IWX vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWX and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWX vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWXWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-42.65%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-42.65%

+36.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-4.02%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-20.87%

+17.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

16.66%

-15.11%

Volatility

IWX vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) is 4.12%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that IWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWXWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

18.14%

-14.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

46.41%

-38.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

53.16%

-42.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

53.31%

-39.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

53.31%

-36.81%

IWX vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWX vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
1.45%1.59%1.97%2.13%2.07%1.79%2.12%2.60%2.66%2.12%2.22%2.77%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
94.34%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWX and WNTR have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to IWX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 29.72% for IWX. On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 29.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 1.45% for IWX.

IWX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 1.01% for WNTR.

IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWX and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer