PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWX vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWX vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -18.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWX having a 12.38% annualized return and SLV not far behind at 11.99%.


IWX

1D
1.25%
1M
2.38%
YTD
16.33%
6M
15.40%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
12.38%

SLV

1D
1.12%
1M
-24.90%
YTD
-18.72%
6M
-19.72%
1Y
58.62%
3Y*
35.82%
5Y*
16.71%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWX vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
16.33%18.23%14.89%10.45%-5.33%23.33%1.46%25.82%-6.53%14.05%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-18.72%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IWX and SLV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009

0.19

The correlation between IWX and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (10 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWX vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWX
IWX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWX vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWXSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.22

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

1.16

+3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.23

2.63

+16.60

IWX vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWX and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWX vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWXSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-76.28%

+40.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-50.97%

+44.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.37%

-50.97%

+37.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

-50.97%

+32.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

-50.97%

+15.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-50.42%

+50.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-44.66%

+40.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

22.37%

-20.82%

Volatility

IWX vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) is 4.12%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 15.50%. This indicates that IWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWXSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

15.50%

-11.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

59.60%

-51.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

60.77%

-50.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

36.74%

-22.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

32.16%

-15.66%

IWX vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWX vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
1.45%1.59%1.97%2.13%2.07%1.79%2.12%2.60%2.66%2.12%2.22%2.77%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWX and SLV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (15.50%) compared to IWX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, IWX leads with 12.38% vs 11.99% for SLV. On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWX has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 11.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IWX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IWX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SLV is Silver. IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.50% for SLV.

IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWX and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer