IWX vs. INCE
IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) and INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Value Index, while INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. IWX is passively managed, while INCE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWX returned 12.91%/yr vs 10.49%/yr for INCE. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IWX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for INCE.
Performance
IWX vs. INCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 22.04% return, which is significantly higher than INCE's 14.91% return.
IWX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- YTD
- 22.04%
- 1Y
- 36.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.75%
INCE
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $621.36K | $657.47K | $945.62K | |
| $52.73M | $47.86M | $34.45M |
IWX vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 22.04% | 18.23% | 14.89% | 10.45% | -5.33% | 23.33% | 1.46% | 25.82% | -6.53% | 14.05% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 14.91% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWX and INCE is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IWX and INCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWX vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWX
INCE
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
IWX
INCE
Financial Services
IWX
INCE
Healthcare
IWX
INCE
Consumer Cyclical
IWX
INCE
Industrials
IWX
INCE
Consumer Defensive
IWX
INCE
Energy
IWX
INCE
Communication Services
IWX
INCE
Basic Materials
IWX
INCE
Utilities
IWX
INCE
Real Estate
IWX
INCE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWX vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank
IWX
INCE
IWX vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWX | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.58 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.52 | 5.24 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.26 | 20.20 | +4.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWX vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, which is greater than INCE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and INCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWX | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -33.95% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -4.90% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -14.01% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -18.40% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.16% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -3.22% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 1.27% | +0.23% |
Volatility
IWX vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.46%. This indicates that IWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWX | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 2.46% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 6.15% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 8.40% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 13.25% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 15.60% | +0.89% |
IWX vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWX vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison
IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than INCE's 4.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.84% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.38% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWX and INCE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to INCE (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs INCE's -33.95%.
On 5-year performance, IWX leads with 12.91% vs 10.49% for INCE. On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWX has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for INCE.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 1.38% for IWX.
IWX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.29% for INCE.
IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWX and INCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer