IWX vs. IAU
IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IWX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Value Index, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWX returned 11.66%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for IAU. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
IWX vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IWX has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 11.66%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.
IWX
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
IAU
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
IWX vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 13.79% | 18.23% | 14.89% | 10.45% | -5.33% | 23.33% | 1.46% | 25.82% | -6.53% | 14.05% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 2.98% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWX and IAU is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009 | 0.05 |
The correlation between IWX and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWX vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWX
IAU
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
IWX
IAU
-
Technology
IWX
IAU
-
Healthcare
IWX
IAU
-
Industrials
IWX
IAU
-
Communication Services
IWX
IAU
-
Consumer Defensive
IWX
IAU
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWX
IAU
-
Energy
IWX
IAU
-
Utilities
IWX
IAU
-
Basic Materials
IWX
IAU
-
Real Estate
IWX
IAU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWX vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
IWX
IAU
IWX vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWX | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.24 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 1.69 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.76 | 4.19 | +14.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWX | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 1.23 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 1.03 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.84 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.62 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
IWX vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWX | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -45.14% | +9.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -19.18% | +12.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -19.18% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -20.93% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.76% | -21.82% | -13.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -17.70% | +17.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -15.96% | +12.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 7.71% | -6.18% |
Volatility
IWX vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) is 2.83%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWX | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 5.50% | -2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 23.02% | -15.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 26.42% | -16.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 17.95% | -4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 15.90% | +0.61% |
IWX vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWX vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.48% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWX and IAU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to IWX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 11.66% for IWX. On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.
IWX has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
IWX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IAU is Gold. IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.25% for IAU.
IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWX and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer