PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWX vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWX vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IWX has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 11.66%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.


IWX

1D
0.01%
1M
4.49%
YTD
13.79%
6M
14.63%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
11.66%

IAU

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.98%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWX vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
13.79%18.23%14.89%10.45%-5.33%23.33%1.46%25.82%-6.53%14.05%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
2.98%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IWX and IAU is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009

0.05

The correlation between IWX and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWX vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWX
IAU

Financial Services

21.5%

-

Technology

14.2%

-

Healthcare

12.5%

-

Industrials

11.3%

-

Communication Services

11.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%

-

Energy

6.4%

-

Utilities

3.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Real Estate

1.9%
100.0%

Financial Services

IWX
21.5%
IAU

-

Technology

IWX
14.2%
IAU

-

Healthcare

IWX
12.5%
IAU

-

Industrials

IWX
11.3%
IAU

-

Communication Services

IWX
11.0%
IAU

-

Consumer Defensive

IWX
8.2%
IAU

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWX
6.8%
IAU

-

Energy

IWX
6.4%
IAU

-

Utilities

IWX
3.2%
IAU

-

Basic Materials

IWX
3.0%
IAU

-

Real Estate

IWX
1.9%
IAU
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWX vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWX
IWX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWX vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWXIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.24

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

1.69

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.76

4.19

+14.58

IWX vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWX and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWXIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

1.23

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

1.03

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.84

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.62

+0.08

Drawdowns

IWX vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWXIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-45.14%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-19.18%

+12.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.37%

-19.18%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

-20.93%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

-21.82%

-13.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.70%

+17.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-15.96%

+12.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

7.71%

-6.18%

Volatility

IWX vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) is 2.83%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWXIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

5.50%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

23.02%

-15.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.02%

26.42%

-16.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

17.95%

-4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

15.90%

+0.61%

IWX vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWX vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
1.48%1.59%1.97%2.13%2.07%1.79%2.12%2.60%2.66%2.12%2.22%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWX and IAU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to IWX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 11.66% for IWX. On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.

IWX has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

IWX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IAU is Gold. IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.25% for IAU.

IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWX and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer