IWX vs. DLN
IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - IWX tracks the Russell Top 200 Value Index while DLN tracks the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWX returned 12.06%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
IWX vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IWX has underperformed DLN with an annualized return of 12.06%, while DLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.86% annualized return.
IWX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 6M
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
DLN
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 21.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
IWX vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 15.10% | 18.23% | 14.89% | 10.45% | -5.33% | 23.33% | 1.46% | 25.82% | -6.53% | 14.05% |
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 9.95% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 28.91% | -5.82% | 18.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWX and DLN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | 0.92 |
The correlation between IWX and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWX vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWX
DLN
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IWX
DLN
Technology
IWX
DLN
Healthcare
IWX
DLN
Industrials
IWX
DLN
Communication Services
IWX
DLN
Consumer Defensive
IWX
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
IWX
DLN
Energy
IWX
DLN
Basic Materials
IWX
DLN
Utilities
IWX
DLN
Real Estate
IWX
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWX vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
IWX
DLN
IWX vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWX | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.43 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 3.53 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.71 | 14.80 | +3.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWX vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWX | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -57.84% | +22.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -6.10% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -13.71% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -16.26% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.76% | -35.82% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -1.12% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -7.50% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.45% | +0.10% |
Volatility
IWX vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.78%. This indicates that IWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWX | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 2.78% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 7.00% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 9.03% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 13.27% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 16.14% | +0.36% |
IWX vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWX vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IWX and DLN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IWX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to DLN (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 10-year performance, DLN leads with 12.86% vs 12.06% for IWX. On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.46% for IWX.
IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.28% for DLN.
IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWX and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer