IWX vs. AVLV
IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - IWX tracks the Russell Top 200 Value Index while AVLV tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IWX returned 18.86%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for AVLV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVLV.
Performance
IWX vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.
IWX
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
AVLV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 22.01%
- 1Y
- 38.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWX vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 13.79% | 18.23% | 14.89% | 10.45% | -5.33% | 5.21% |
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 20.64% | 15.12% | 17.49% | 17.43% | -5.53% | 5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWX and AVLV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IWX and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWX vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWX
AVLV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
IWX
AVLV
Technology
IWX
AVLV
Healthcare
IWX
AVLV
Industrials
IWX
AVLV
Communication Services
IWX
AVLV
Consumer Defensive
IWX
AVLV
Consumer Cyclical
IWX
AVLV
Energy
IWX
AVLV
Utilities
IWX
AVLV
Basic Materials
IWX
AVLV
Real Estate
IWX
AVLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWX vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank
IWX
AVLV
IWX vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.57 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 6.09 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.76 | 24.39 | -5.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 3.18 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.86 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
IWX vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and AVLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -19.50% | -16.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -6.39% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -19.50% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -3.93% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.59% | -0.06% |
Volatility
IWX vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) is 2.83%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that IWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 3.12% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 9.04% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 12.29% | -2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 17.35% | -3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 17.35% | -0.84% |
IWX vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWX vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison
IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.48% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IWX and AVLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVLV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to IWX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs AVLV's -19.50%.
On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 18.86% for IWX. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 18.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWX.
IWX has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.
IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.15% for AVLV.
AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWX and AVLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer