PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWX vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWX vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IWX has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 11.67%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.


IWX

1D
0.84%
1M
4.24%
YTD
14.74%
6M
15.73%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
11.67%

ACWI

1D
0.30%
1M
4.45%
YTD
12.47%
6M
13.07%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWX vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
14.74%18.23%14.89%10.45%-5.33%23.33%1.46%25.82%-6.53%14.05%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.47%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IWX and ACWI is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009

0.85

The correlation between IWX and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWX vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWX
ACWI

Financial Services

21.5%
16.1%

Technology

14.2%
29.4%

Healthcare

12.5%
8.1%

Industrials

11.3%
10.9%

Communication Services

11.0%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
9.3%

Energy

6.4%
4.2%

Utilities

3.2%
2.6%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Financial Services

IWX
21.5%
ACWI
16.1%

Technology

IWX
14.2%
ACWI
29.4%

Healthcare

IWX
12.5%
ACWI
8.1%

Industrials

IWX
11.3%
ACWI
10.9%

Communication Services

IWX
11.0%
ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

IWX
8.2%
ACWI
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IWX
6.8%
ACWI
9.3%

Energy

IWX
6.4%
ACWI
4.2%

Utilities

IWX
3.2%
ACWI
2.6%

Basic Materials

IWX
3.0%
ACWI
3.7%

Real Estate

IWX
1.9%
ACWI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWX vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWX
IWX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWX vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWXACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.42

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

3.02

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.89

13.55

+6.34

IWX vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWX Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWX and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWXACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

2.30

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.71

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.75

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.43

+0.28

Drawdowns

IWX vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWXACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-56.00%

+20.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-9.73%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.37%

-16.55%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

-26.42%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

-33.53%

-2.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-8.61%

+4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

2.16%

-0.63%

Volatility

IWX vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) is 2.76%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that IWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWXACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

3.83%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

10.30%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.04%

12.79%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

16.05%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

17.11%

-0.60%

IWX vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWX vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
1.47%1.59%1.97%2.13%2.07%1.79%2.12%2.60%2.66%2.12%2.22%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWX and ACWI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWI has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to IWX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.82% vs 11.67% for IWX. On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

IWX has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

IWX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.32% for ACWI.

IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWX and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer