IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

IWVG.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XMWD.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - IWVG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD while XMWD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWVG.L returned 17.11%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for XMWD.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWVG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for XMWD.L.

Performance

IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IWVG.L is traded in GBP, while XMWD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMWD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWVG.L achieves a 30.47% return, which is significantly higher than XMWD.L's 10.82% return.

IWVG.L

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -2.19%
• 6M: 27.03%
• YTD: 30.47%
• 1Y: 57.35%
• 3Y*: 25.91%
• 5Y*: 17.11%
• 10Y*: —

XMWD.L

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 8.89%
• YTD: 10.82%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 12.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IWVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	30.47%	31.27%	6.58%	13.08%	1.04%	21.24%	-6.86%	14.68%	-8.59%
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C	10.82%	12.23%	20.95%	18.06%	-8.53%	23.18%	12.63%	22.30%	-2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IWVG.L and XMWD.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018	0.78

The correlation between IWVG.L and XMWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWVG.L	XMWD.L
Technology	33.2%	31.3%
Financial Services	14.3%	15.1%
Industrials	11.4%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	9.2%
Communication Services	8.3%	8.9%
Healthcare	8.1%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	4.9%
Energy	3.8%	3.8%
Basic Materials	2.9%	3.2%
Utilities	2.4%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWVG.L

IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 97
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

XMWD.L

XMWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XMWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
XMWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
XMWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XMWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWVG.L	XMWD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.89	1.87	+2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.20	2.66	+2.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	1.35	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.16	3.50	+4.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.11	12.80	+14.31

IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is higher than the XMWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWVG.L and XMWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, smaller than the maximum XMWD.L drawdown of -48.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVG.L and XMWD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWVG.L	XMWD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.07%	-48.53%	+20.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-6.43%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.92%	-18.90%	+4.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.92%	-18.90%	+4.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.79%	-0.51%	-4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-7.74%	+3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	1.76%	+0.35%

Volatility

IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) at 3.26%. This indicates that IWVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWVG.L	XMWD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	3.26%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.81%	9.62%	+3.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.71%	12.08%	+2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.40%	14.57%	-1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.66%	15.42%	+0.24%

IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWVG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XMWD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWVG.L vs. XMWD.L - Dividend Comparison

IWVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while XMWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IWVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.90%	2.48%	3.12%	3.22%	3.11%	2.61%	2.37%	2.90%	2.48%
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWVG.L and XMWD.L in my portfolio?

IWVG.L and XMWD.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWVG.L or XMWD.L?

On fees, IWVG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWVG.L or XMWD.L?

IWVG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XMWD.L.

What is the main difference between IWVG.L and XMWD.L?

IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while XMWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWVG.L and 0.45% for XMWD.L.