PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWRD.AS vs. TSWE.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWRD.AS vs. TSWE.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWRD.AS achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly lower than TSWE.AS's 13.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWRD.AS having a 12.57% annualized return and TSWE.AS not far behind at 12.01%.


IWRD.AS

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.53%
YTD
11.01%
6M
11.58%
1Y
23.56%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
12.57%

TSWE.AS

1D
-0.19%
1M
7.45%
YTD
13.49%
6M
16.16%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
12.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWRD.AS vs. TSWE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWRD.AS
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF
11.01%6.83%26.78%19.68%-13.85%32.06%5.87%29.11%-4.38%7.51%
TSWE.AS
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF
13.49%13.10%17.22%16.38%-13.18%29.50%5.58%26.46%-5.21%8.51%

Correlation

The correlation between IWRD.AS and TSWE.AS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2013

0.92

The correlation between IWRD.AS and TSWE.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWRD.AS vs. TSWE.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWRD.AS
IWRD.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TSWE.AS
TSWE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TSWE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWRD.AS vs. TSWE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWRD.ASTSWE.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.26

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

12.78

+0.92

IWRD.AS vs. TSWE.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the TSWE.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWRD.AS and TSWE.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWRD.ASTSWE.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.04

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.84

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.79

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.73

-0.23

Drawdowns

IWRD.AS vs. TSWE.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWRD.AS drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than TSWE.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.AS and TSWE.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWRD.ASTSWE.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.51%

-33.67%

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-7.97%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.50%

-19.53%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-19.53%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.71%

-33.67%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.19%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-4.83%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.05%

-0.34%

Volatility

IWRD.AS vs. TSWE.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) is 2.81%, while VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that IWRD.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSWE.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWRD.ASTSWE.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.66%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

9.92%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

12.76%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

13.65%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

14.93%

+0.23%

IWRD.AS vs. TSWE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWRD.AS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSWE.AS's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWRD.AS vs. TSWE.AS - Dividend Comparison

IWRD.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than TSWE.AS's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWRD.AS
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF
0.85%0.95%1.05%1.32%1.49%1.01%1.21%1.62%1.84%1.67%1.70%1.80%
TSWE.AS
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF
2.57%1.94%2.18%2.23%2.38%1.64%1.88%2.34%2.45%2.09%1.85%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWRD.AS and TSWE.AS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSWE.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSWE.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWRD.AS.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IWRD.AS and 0.20% for TSWE.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWRD.AS and TSWE.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer