IWRD.AS vs. ICHN.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS).
IWRD.AS and ICHN.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWRD.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 28, 2005. ICHN.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2019. Both IWRD.AS and ICHN.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWRD.AS or ICHN.AS.
Key characteristics
IWRD.AS | ICHN.AS | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 15.41% | 2.10% |
1Y Return | 20.39% | -2.95% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 8.77% | -13.29% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 11.67% | -4.81% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.02 | -0.15 |
Daily Std Dev | 10.90% | 22.55% |
Max Drawdown | -51.80% | -62.67% |
Current Drawdown | -2.05% | -54.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWRD.AS and ICHN.AS is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IWRD.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IWRD.AS achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly higher than ICHN.AS's 2.10% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWRD.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWRD.AS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ICHN.AS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWRD.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWRD.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Dividend Comparison
IWRD.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while ICHN.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.57% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 1.81% | 2.14% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.99% | 2.05% | 2.34% |
iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IWRD.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWRD.AS drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, smaller than the maximum ICHN.AS drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.AS and ICHN.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWRD.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS) have volatilities of 4.00% and 4.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.