PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWRD.AS vs. TDIV.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWRD.AS vs. TDIV.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWRD.AS achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than TDIV.AS's 9.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWRD.AS having a 12.57% annualized return and TDIV.AS not far behind at 12.08%.


IWRD.AS

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.53%
YTD
11.01%
6M
11.58%
1Y
23.56%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
12.57%

TDIV.AS

1D
0.27%
1M
0.35%
YTD
9.61%
6M
13.02%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWRD.AS vs. TDIV.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWRD.AS
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF
11.01%6.83%26.78%19.68%-13.85%32.06%5.87%29.11%-4.38%7.51%
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
9.61%24.40%15.98%10.91%16.18%27.85%-10.17%20.97%-7.12%2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between IWRD.AS and TDIV.AS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2016

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between IWRD.AS and TDIV.AS has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWRD.AS vs. TDIV.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWRD.AS
IWRD.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV.AS
TDIV.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWRD.AS vs. TDIV.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWRD.ASTDIV.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.51

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

7.16

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

19.94

-6.24

IWRD.AS vs. TDIV.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWRD.AS and TDIV.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWRD.ASTDIV.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.78

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

1.42

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.83

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.84

-0.34

Drawdowns

IWRD.AS vs. TDIV.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWRD.AS drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than TDIV.AS's maximum drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.AS and TDIV.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWRD.ASTDIV.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.51%

-36.06%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-3.51%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.50%

-15.26%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-15.26%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.71%

-36.06%

+2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-2.23%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-3.93%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.26%

+0.45%

Volatility

IWRD.AS vs. TDIV.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) at 2.42%. This indicates that IWRD.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIV.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWRD.ASTDIV.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.42%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

6.64%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

9.06%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

12.06%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

14.32%

+0.84%

IWRD.AS vs. TDIV.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWRD.AS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV.AS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWRD.AS vs. TDIV.AS - Dividend Comparison

IWRD.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than TDIV.AS's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWRD.AS
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF
0.85%0.95%1.05%1.32%1.49%1.01%1.21%1.62%1.84%1.67%1.70%1.80%
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
4.94%3.58%4.19%4.98%4.55%3.98%4.12%4.40%4.93%3.95%1.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWRD.AS and TDIV.AS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDIV.AS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDIV.AS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWRD.AS.

IWRD.AS is categorized as Global Equities, while TDIV.AS is Global Equity Income. IWRD.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while TDIV.AS tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IWRD.AS and 0.38% for TDIV.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWRD.AS and TDIV.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer