TDIV.AS vs. VHYL.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS).
TDIV.AS and VHYL.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TDIV.AS is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. It was launched on May 23, 2016. VHYL.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD. It was launched on May 21, 2013. Both TDIV.AS and VHYL.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TDIV.AS or VHYL.AS.
Correlation
The correlation between TDIV.AS and VHYL.AS is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TDIV.AS vs. VHYL.AS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TDIV.AS:
2.20
VHYL.AS:
1.98
TDIV.AS:
2.86
VHYL.AS:
2.70
TDIV.AS:
1.40
VHYL.AS:
1.37
TDIV.AS:
3.20
VHYL.AS:
2.83
TDIV.AS:
13.52
VHYL.AS:
11.53
TDIV.AS:
1.68%
VHYL.AS:
1.63%
TDIV.AS:
10.35%
VHYL.AS:
9.44%
TDIV.AS:
-36.06%
VHYL.AS:
-34.08%
TDIV.AS:
-0.58%
VHYL.AS:
-0.48%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDIV.AS achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than VHYL.AS's 4.21% return.
TDIV.AS
5.38%
4.50%
16.41%
22.10%
12.12%
N/A
VHYL.AS
4.21%
3.22%
14.87%
18.85%
8.32%
7.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDIV.AS vs. VHYL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDIV.AS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYL.AS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TDIV.AS vs. VHYL.AS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TDIV.AS
VHYL.AS
TDIV.AS vs. VHYL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TDIV.AS vs. VHYL.AS - Dividend Comparison
TDIV.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than VHYL.AS's 2.70% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV.AS VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.97% | 4.19% | 4.98% | 4.55% | 3.98% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 4.93% | 3.95% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHYL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing | 2.70% | 2.82% | 3.15% | 3.60% | 2.59% | 2.68% | 2.89% | 3.14% | 2.76% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
TDIV.AS vs. VHYL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDIV.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, which is greater than VHYL.AS's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV.AS and VHYL.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TDIV.AS vs. VHYL.AS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) at 3.45%. This indicates that TDIV.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.