PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWQU.L vs. WRDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWQU.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWQU.L is traded in USD, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWQU.L achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than WRDA.L's 9.90% return.


IWQU.L

1D
0.85%
1M
1.95%
YTD
8.47%
6M
9.52%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.42%

WRDA.L

1D
0.12%
1M
2.55%
YTD
9.90%
6M
10.70%
1Y
25.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWQU.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IWQU.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
8.47%15.28%14.63%
WRDA.L
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc
9.90%21.28%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IWQU.L and WRDA.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024

0.86

The correlation between IWQU.L and WRDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWQU.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWQU.L
IWQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IWQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

WRDA.L
WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWQU.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWQU.LWRDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.03

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

13.35

-3.21

IWQU.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWQU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWQU.L and WRDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWQU.LWRDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.33

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

1.60

-0.81

Drawdowns

IWQU.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWQU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.05%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -16.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWQU.L and WRDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWQU.LWRDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.05%

-16.63%

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.53%

-8.60%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.43%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-1.67%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.96%

+0.11%

Volatility

IWQU.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 2.69%. This indicates that IWQU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWQU.LWRDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.69%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

8.39%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

11.21%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

13.29%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

13.29%

+2.52%

IWQU.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWQU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWQU.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWQU.L nor WRDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IWQU.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWQU.L.

IWQU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWQU.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWQU.L and WRDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer