IWQU.L vs. EMIM.L
IWQU.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS) and EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IWQU.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while EMIM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWQU.L returned 12.75%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for EMIM.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWQU.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EMIM.L.
Performance
IWQU.L vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWQU.L is traded in USD, while EMIM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EMIM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWQU.L achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than EMIM.L's 22.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IWQU.L has outperformed EMIM.L with an annualized return of 12.75%, while EMIM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.
IWQU.L
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 9.99%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.75%
EMIM.L
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 22.27%
- 6M
- 25.64%
- 1Y
- 45.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
IWQU.L vs. EMIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWQU.L iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS | 8.72% | 15.28% | 17.17% | 25.90% | -19.26% | 23.70% | 14.95% | 29.64% | -7.53% | 23.57% |
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.27% | 32.66% | 7.36% | 10.47% | -19.77% | -0.17% | 18.43% | 17.21% | -14.45% | 36.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWQU.L and EMIM.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IWQU.L and EMIM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWQU.L vs. EMIM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWQU.L
EMIM.L
IWQU.L vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWQU.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.28 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | 11.64 | -1.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWQU.L vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWQU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.05%, smaller than the maximum EMIM.L drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWQU.L and EMIM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWQU.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.05% | -39.32% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | -12.93% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.09% | -17.29% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.70% | -35.46% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.05% | -39.32% | +6.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.99% | +3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -13.99% | +9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 3.65% | -1.59% |
Volatility
IWQU.L vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) is 3.28%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that IWQU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWQU.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 8.11% | -4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 16.75% | -7.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 19.29% | -7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 18.40% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 19.28% | -3.52% |
IWQU.L vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWQU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWQU.L vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWQU.L nor EMIM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IWQU.L and EMIM.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMIM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMIM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWQU.L.
IWQU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EMIM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IWQU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while EMIM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWQU.L and 0.18% for EMIM.L.
Find the right allocation for IWQU.L and EMIM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer