IWP vs. AVDE
IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and AVDE (Avantis International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index, while AVDE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. IWP is passively managed, while AVDE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWP returned 5.99%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for AVDE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.23% expense ratio.
Performance
IWP vs. AVDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWP achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than AVDE's 8.71% return.
IWP
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
AVDE
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
IWP vs. AVDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 1.66% | 8.45% | 21.86% | 25.70% | -26.90% | 12.60% | 35.25% | 7.65% |
AVDE Avantis International Equity ETF | 8.71% | 38.05% | 4.88% | 17.18% | -13.68% | 13.62% | 8.26% | 8.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWP and AVDE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IWP and AVDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWP vs. AVDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWP
AVDE
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Industrials
IWP
AVDE
Consumer Cyclical
IWP
AVDE
Technology
IWP
AVDE
Healthcare
IWP
AVDE
Financial Services
IWP
AVDE
Communication Services
IWP
AVDE
Energy
IWP
AVDE
Utilities
IWP
AVDE
Consumer Defensive
IWP
AVDE
Real Estate
IWP
AVDE
Basic Materials
IWP
AVDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWP vs. AVDE — Risk / Return Rank
IWP
AVDE
IWP vs. AVDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) and Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWP | AVDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.31 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 2.19 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 8.59 | -8.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWP | AVDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 1.71 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.59 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.63 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
IWP vs. AVDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWP drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than AVDE's maximum drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWP and AVDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWP | AVDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.92% | -36.99% | -19.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -11.48% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.20% | -13.46% | -11.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.62% | -28.73% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -3.02% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -6.16% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 2.92% | +2.16% |
Volatility
IWP vs. AVDE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) and Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWP | AVDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 4.67% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.93% | 12.43% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 14.75% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 16.33% | +6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 18.92% | +2.78% |
IWP vs. AVDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IWP and AVDE have an expense ratio of 0.23%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWP vs. AVDE - Dividend Comparison
IWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than AVDE's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDE Avantis International Equity ETF | 2.56% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.01% | 2.79% | 2.46% | 1.63% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.16% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWP and AVDE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVDE has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to IWP (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWP dropped -56.92% vs AVDE's -36.99%.
On 5-year performance, AVDE leads with 9.61% vs 5.99% for IWP. Both ETFs have the same 0.23% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVDE has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWP and AVDE have the same expense ratio: 0.23% per year.
AVDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.
IWP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while AVDE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis.
AVDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWP and AVDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer