IWO vs. SPMO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWO returned 11.52%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for SPMO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWO charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.

Performance

IWO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWO achieves a 17.80% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IWO has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 11.52%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.

IWO

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 17.80%
• 6M: 14.55%
• 1Y: 36.26%
• 3Y*: 16.93%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 11.52%

SPMO

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 4.23%
• YTD: 28.15%
• 6M: 28.70%
• 1Y: 43.47%
• 3Y*: 41.53%
• 5Y*: 23.50%
• 10Y*: 20.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF	17.80%	12.90%	15.04%	18.51%	-26.27%	2.54%	34.68%	28.48%	-9.43%	22.25%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	28.15%	26.58%	45.82%	17.56%	-10.45%	22.64%	28.25%	25.93%	-0.92%	27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between IWO and SPMO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015	0.65

The correlation between IWO and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWO vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWO	SPMO
Technology	23.6%	54.8%
Industrials	23.1%	10.9%
Healthcare	22.4%	6.2%
Financial Services	8.2%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	1.3%
Basic Materials	4.2%	1.6%
Energy	3.5%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	4.0%
Communication Services	2.2%	8.7%
Real Estate	2.1%	0.9%
Utilities	0.7%	2.5%

Return for Risk

IWO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWO

IWO Risk / Return Rank: 54
IWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
IWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IWO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
IWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
IWO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

SPMO

SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 79
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWO	SPMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.24	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.98	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.41	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	3.44	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.75	13.01	-4.26

IWO vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWO and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWO drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWO and SPMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWO	SPMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.11%	-30.95%	-29.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.87%	-12.70%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.57%	-20.13%	-8.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.51%	-22.74%	-17.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.02%	-30.95%	-11.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-1.68%	+1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.69%	-4.60%	-12.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	3.35%	+0.81%

Volatility

IWO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) is 8.35%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that IWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWO	SPMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.35%	10.29%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.64%	16.73%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.08%	19.48%	+2.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.60%	19.65%	+4.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.18%	20.48%	+3.70%

IWO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

IWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than SPMO's 0.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF	0.40%	0.56%	0.80%	0.73%	0.73%	0.32%	0.44%	0.71%	0.76%	0.73%	0.97%	0.89%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	0.67%	0.73%	0.48%	1.63%	1.66%	0.52%	1.27%	1.39%	1.05%	0.77%	1.94%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWO and SPMO in my portfolio?

IWO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWO or SPMO?

SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to IWO (8.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWO dropped -60.11% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

Which ETF is better, IWO or SPMO?

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 11.52% for IWO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IWO has been the lower-risk option at 8.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWO or SPMO?

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 11.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWO or SPMO?

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWO or SPMO?

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.40% for IWO.

What is the main difference between IWO and SPMO?

IWO is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. IWO tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWO and 0.13% for SPMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.