IWO vs. BBMC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) and BBMC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index while BBMC tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWO returned 5.77%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for BBMC. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IWO charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for BBMC.

Performance

IWO vs. BBMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWO having a 20.41% return and BBMC slightly higher at 20.64%.

IWO

• 1D: 2.68%
• 1M: 0.41%
• 6M: 14.89%
• YTD: 20.41%
• 1Y: 33.81%
• 3Y*: 17.15%
• 5Y*: 5.77%
• 10Y*: 10.96%
• ALL TIME*: 7.07%

BBMC

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 1.26%
• 6M: 14.29%
• YTD: 20.64%
• 1Y: 30.58%
• 3Y*: 18.21%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	$1.04M	$1.42M	$2.55M
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF	$179.14M	$160.12M	$166.50M

IWO vs. BBMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF	20.41%	12.90%	15.04%	18.51%	-26.27%	2.54%	68.00%
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	20.64%	12.24%	15.15%	18.37%	-19.77%	17.64%	62.09%

Correlation

The correlation between IWO and BBMC is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020	0.95

The correlation between IWO and BBMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWO vs. BBMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWO	BBMC
Healthcare	28.9%	12.9%
Technology	22.1%	15.0%
Industrials	15.9%	22.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	11.8%
Financial Services	8.0%	12.9%
Basic Materials	5.0%	4.4%
Energy	4.8%	3.5%
Real Estate	2.4%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	4.0%
Communication Services	1.9%	3.4%
Utilities	0.6%	2.7%

Return for Risk

IWO vs. BBMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWO

IWO Risk / Return Rank: 55
IWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
IWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
IWO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
IWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
IWO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

BBMC

BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 74
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWO vs. BBMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWO	BBMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.83	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	2.60	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	3.15	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.84	12.17	-4.33

IWO vs. BBMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the BBMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWO and BBMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWO vs. BBMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWO drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than BBMC's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWO and BBMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWO	BBMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.11%	-30.11%	-30.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.87%	-9.75%	-5.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.57%	-24.18%	-4.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.51%	-30.11%	-10.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	0.00%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.62%	-8.72%	-7.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	2.52%	+1.81%

Volatility

IWO vs. BBMC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) at 4.04%. This indicates that IWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWO	BBMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.69%	4.04%	+2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.25%	12.72%	+4.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.51%	16.83%	+5.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.67%	20.61%	+4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.20%	20.96%	+3.24%

IWO vs. BBMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BBMC's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWO vs. BBMC - Dividend Comparison

IWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than BBMC's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.10%	1.25%	1.31%	1.36%	1.48%	0.87%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF	0.42%	0.56%	0.80%	0.73%	0.73%	0.32%	0.44%	0.71%	0.76%	0.73%	0.97%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWO and BBMC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, IWO and BBMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IWO or BBMC?

IWO has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to BBMC (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWO dropped -60.11% vs BBMC's -30.11%.

Which ETF is better, IWO or BBMC?

On 5-year performance, BBMC leads with 8.87% vs 5.77% for IWO. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BBMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWO or BBMC?

Over the 5-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 8.87% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWO or BBMC?

BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWO or BBMC?

BBMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.42% for IWO.

What is the main difference between IWO and BBMC?

IWO tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWO and 0.07% for BBMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.