PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMY vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMY vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.82% return.


IWMY

1D
1.41%
1M
2.87%
YTD
13.83%
6M
12.08%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.68%
1M
2.84%
YTD
19.82%
6M
19.65%
1Y
28.76%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMY vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
13.83%10.18%5.56%9.74%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.82%4.34%11.66%13.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and SCHD is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023

0.60

The correlation between IWMY and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMY vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMYSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.47

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

6.26

-4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

15.38

-8.30

IWMY vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMYSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.64

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.86

+0.13

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMYSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-33.37%

+14.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-4.61%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-3.32%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

1.87%

+1.64%

Volatility

IWMY vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.69%. This indicates that IWMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMYSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

2.69%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

7.65%

+5.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

10.95%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

14.38%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

16.71%

-0.95%

IWMY vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWMY vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.16%, more than SCHD's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
46.16%63.33%107.92%11.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.24%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMY and SCHD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMY has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to SCHD (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 1-year performance, SCHD leads with 28.76% vs 24.81% for IWMY. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 28.76% return vs 24.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 46.16%, compared with 3.24% for SCHD.

IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while SCHD is Dividend. IWMY tracks Russell 2000 Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IWMY and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMY and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer