IWMY vs. PG
IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) is Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock. Over the past year, IWMY returned 21.26% vs -5.68% for PG. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IWMY vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return.
IWMY
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
IWMY vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 13.70% | 10.18% | 5.56% | 10.06% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -1.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMY and PG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMY vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
IWMY
PG
IWMY vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWMY | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.97 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | -0.37 | +2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.03 | -0.68 | +6.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWMY vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMY | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -54.25% | +35.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | -15.52% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -13.29% | +13.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -12.16% | +9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 8.80% | -5.26% |
Volatility
IWMY vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) have volatilities of 6.80% and 6.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMY | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 6.99% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 15.01% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.36% | 18.78% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 17.82% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 19.05% | -3.11% |
Dividends
IWMY vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.61%, more than PG's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 44.61% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMY and PG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to IWMY (6.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs PG's -54.25%.
IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWMY and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer