PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMY vs. GPTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMY vs. GPTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) and YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly lower than GPTY's 19.56% return.


IWMY

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.14%
6M
7.05%
YTD
13.63%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.78%

GPTY

1D
1.15%
1M
-9.79%
6M
17.11%
YTD
19.56%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMY vs. GPTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and GPTY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.69

The correlation between IWMY and GPTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMY vs. GPTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

GPTY
GPTY Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GPTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GPTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. GPTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) and YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWMYGPTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.34

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

3.28

+1.67

IWMY vs. GPTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the GPTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and GPTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. GPTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum GPTY drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and GPTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMYGPTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-26.62%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-19.32%

+7.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-13.56%

+11.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-6.67%

+3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

7.87%

-4.32%

Volatility

IWMY vs. GPTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) is 3.33%, while YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that IWMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMYGPTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

8.81%

-5.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

21.77%

-8.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

26.60%

-10.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

29.68%

-13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.80%

29.68%

-13.88%

IWMY vs. GPTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMY has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GPTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWMY vs. GPTY - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.60%, more than GPTY's 38.50% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
38.50%34.23%0.00%0.00%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
42.60%63.33%107.92%11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMY and GPTY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPTY has higher volatility (8.81%) compared to IWMY (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs GPTY's -26.62%.

On 1-year performance, GPTY leads with 25.72% vs 17.50% for IWMY. On fees, GPTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPTY has performed better with a 25.72% return vs 17.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for IWMY.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 42.60%, compared with 38.50% for GPTY.

IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while GPTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for IWMY and 0.99% for GPTY.

IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMY and GPTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer