IWMY vs. AMDY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. IWMY is passively managed, while AMDY is actively managed. Over the past year, IWMY returned 23.33% vs 240.44% for AMDY. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

IWMY vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 110.49% return.

IWMY

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 23.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDY

• 1D: 3.39%
• 1M: 46.76%
• YTD: 110.49%
• 6M: 111.80%
• 1Y: 240.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMY vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	12.25%	10.18%	5.56%	9.74%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	110.49%	53.93%	-17.00%	33.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and AMDY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023	0.46

Return for Risk

IWMY vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 40
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 93
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWMY	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	4.53	-3.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	4.54	-2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.64	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	8.77	-6.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.66	19.77	-13.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWMY vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 4.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWMY	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	4.53	-3.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	1.25	-0.30

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMY	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.72%	-53.92%	+35.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.57%	-27.59%	+16.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	0.00%	-1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-18.02%	+15.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	12.22%	-8.71%

Volatility

IWMY vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) is 5.42%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.81%. This indicates that IWMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMY	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.42%	20.81%	-15.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.62%	39.99%	-27.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	53.40%	-37.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.75%	46.01%	-30.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.75%	46.01%	-30.26%

IWMY vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWMY and AMDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

IWMY vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.96%, less than AMDY's 54.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	54.91%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	45.96%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWMY and AMDY in my portfolio?

IWMY and AMDY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWMY or AMDY?

AMDY has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to IWMY (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

Which ETF is better, IWMY or AMDY?

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 240.44% vs 23.33% for IWMY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWMY or AMDY?

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 240.44% return vs 23.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWMY or AMDY?

IWMY and AMDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWMY or AMDY?

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 45.96% for IWMY.

What is the main difference between IWMY and AMDY?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and YieldMax.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.