IWMY vs. AIPO
IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWMY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
IWMY vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 48.78% return.
IWMY
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 48.78%
- 6M
- 44.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 15.11% | 3.34% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 48.78% | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMY and AIPO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMY vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
IWMY
AIPO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWMY vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWMY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWMY vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -17.31% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -5.35% | +4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -4.45% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility
IWMY vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.36% | 35.52% | -19.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 35.52% | -19.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 35.52% | -19.59% |
IWMY vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWMY vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.68%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 43.68% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMY and AIPO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 43.68%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while AIPO is Building & Construction. IWMY tracks Russell 2000 Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IWMY and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for IWMY and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer