IWMY vs. AIPO
IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while AIPO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWMY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
IWMY vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 52.03% return.
IWMY
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 52.03%
- 6M
- 45.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 12.25% | 2.81% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 52.03% | 8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMY and AIPO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMY vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
IWMY
AIPO
IWMY vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWMY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.66 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWMY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 2.36 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
IWMY vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -17.31% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.12% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -4.38% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | — | — |
Volatility
IWMY vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 34.09% | -18.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 34.09% | -18.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 34.09% | -18.34% |
IWMY vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWMY vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.96%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 45.96% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMY and AIPO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 45.96%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while AIPO is Technology Equities. IWMY tracks Russell 2000 Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IWMY and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for IWMY and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer