PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IWFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF) and IWFS.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - IWFV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD while IWFS.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWFV.L returned 13.95%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for IWFS.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFV.L achieves a 35.48% return, which is significantly higher than IWFS.L's 5.97% return. Over the past 10 years, IWFV.L has outperformed IWFS.L with an annualized return of 13.95%, while IWFS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.12% annualized return.

IWFV.L

1D
0.18%
1M
16.50%
YTD
35.48%
6M
38.78%
1Y
68.86%
3Y*
27.38%
5Y*
17.65%
10Y*
13.95%

IWFS.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.16%
YTD
5.97%
6M
7.57%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
9.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF		35.48%30.69%6.85%13.02%0.95%21.60%-6.91%14.69%-9.34%12.04%
IWFS.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF		5.97%13.13%7.64%9.74%-8.21%13.88%7.33%19.31%-9.50%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFV.L and IWFS.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.89

The correlation between IWFV.L and IWFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWFV.L
IWFS.L

Technology

33.9%
12.0%

Financial Services

14.8%
14.2%

Industrials

11.3%
21.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
9.7%

Communication Services

7.6%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.6%

Energy

3.8%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.0%
7.1%

Utilities

2.5%
6.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
6.9%

Technology

IWFV.L
33.9%
IWFS.L
12.0%

Financial Services

IWFV.L
14.8%
IWFS.L
14.2%

Industrials

IWFV.L
11.3%
IWFS.L
21.4%

Healthcare

IWFV.L
8.8%
IWFS.L
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IWFV.L
7.9%
IWFS.L
9.7%

Communication Services

IWFV.L
7.6%
IWFS.L
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

IWFV.L
4.5%
IWFS.L
6.6%

Energy

IWFV.L
3.8%
IWFS.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

IWFV.L
3.0%
IWFS.L
7.1%

Utilities

IWFV.L
2.5%
IWFS.L
6.3%

Real Estate

IWFV.L
1.8%
IWFS.L
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF

iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF

Often compared with IWFV.L:
IWFV.L vs. OEFIWFV.L vs. VOOIWFV.L vs. IOOIWFV.L vs. IWQU.LIWFV.L vs. VWRA.LIWFV.L vs. SMGB.LIWFV.L vs. IWDA.L
Often compared with IWFS.L:
IWFS.L vs. URTHIWFS.L vs. EQQQ.LIWFS.L vs. VOOIWFS.L vs. XDEQ.LIWFS.L vs. VEAIWFS.L vs. XLKQ.LIWFS.L vs. VHYG.L

Return for Risk

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWFV.L
IWFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IWFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
IWFS.L
IWFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IWFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWFV.LIWFS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.11
1.76

+3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
6.89
2.47

+4.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.97

1.32

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.68

2.16

+7.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.44

7.65

+29.78

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFV.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.11, which is higher than the IWFS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFV.L and IWFS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWFV.LIWFS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11

1.76

+3.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

0.50

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.63

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.63

+0.17

Drawdowns

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFV.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, roughly equal to the maximum IWFS.L drawdown of -29.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFV.L and IWFS.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWFV.LIWFS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-29.90%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-8.31%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

-14.42%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.82%

-17.33%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.79%

-29.90%

+1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.18%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-4.67%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.35%

-0.52%

Volatility

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) at 2.52%. This indicates that IWFV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWFV.LIWFS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

2.52%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

7.94%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

10.23%

+3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.09%

12.96%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

14.40%

+0.70%

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWFV.L and IWFS.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

IWFV.L vs. IWFS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFV.L nor IWFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

IWFV.L and IWFS.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWFV.L and IWFS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

IWFV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while IWFS.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFV.L and IWFS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer