PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWFS.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWFS.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IWFS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWFS.L returned 9.00%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for INFR.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWFS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.

Performance

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFS.L achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than INFR.L's 9.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWFS.L having a 9.00% annualized return and INFR.L not far behind at 8.66%.

IWFS.L

1D
0.39%
1M
2.27%
YTD
6.39%
6M
7.47%
1Y
18.20%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
9.00%

INFR.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
9.52%
6M
8.44%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWFS.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF		6.39%13.13%7.64%9.74%-8.21%13.88%7.33%19.31%-9.50%13.28%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		9.52%5.90%11.49%-4.96%5.77%19.54%-4.70%20.82%4.39%5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFS.L and INFR.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between IWFS.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWFS.L
INFR.L

Industrials

21.4%
20.8%

Financial Services

14.2%
0.0%

Technology

12.0%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%

-

Healthcare

7.4%

-

Basic Materials

7.1%

-

Real Estate

6.9%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%

-

Utilities

6.3%
56.0%

Communication Services

4.8%
1.0%

Energy

3.5%
16.4%

Industrials

IWFS.L
21.4%
INFR.L
20.8%

Financial Services

IWFS.L
14.2%
INFR.L
0.0%

Technology

IWFS.L
12.0%
INFR.L
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IWFS.L
9.7%
INFR.L

-

Healthcare

IWFS.L
7.4%
INFR.L

-

Basic Materials

IWFS.L
7.1%
INFR.L

-

Real Estate

IWFS.L
6.9%
INFR.L
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

IWFS.L
6.6%
INFR.L

-

Utilities

IWFS.L
6.3%
INFR.L
56.0%

Communication Services

IWFS.L
4.8%
INFR.L
1.0%

Energy

IWFS.L
3.5%
INFR.L
16.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF

iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with IWFS.L:
IWFS.L vs. URTHIWFS.L vs. EQQQ.LIWFS.L vs. VOOIWFS.L vs. XDEQ.LIWFS.L vs. VEAIWFS.L vs. IWFV.LIWFS.L vs. XLKQ.L
Often compared with INFR.L:
INFR.L vs. DPGT.LINFR.L vs. IUIT.LINFR.L vs. IWDA.LINFR.L vs. ARCK.LINFR.L vs. FWRG.LINFR.L vs. IDWR.LINFR.L vs. WUTI.L

Return for Risk

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWFS.L
IWFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
IWFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWFS.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.77
1.55

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.49
2.19

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.13

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

7.96

-0.24

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFS.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWFS.LINFR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.55

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.62

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.61

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.52

+0.11

Drawdowns

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFS.L drawdown since its inception was -29.90%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFS.L and INFR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWFS.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.90%

-34.25%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-5.19%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-11.08%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-22.87%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.90%

-26.75%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-3.70%

+2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-6.12%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

2.04%

+0.31%

Volatility

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) is 2.53%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that IWFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWFS.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

3.92%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

8.92%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.23%

10.49%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.96%

12.26%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.39%

14.10%

+0.29%

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFS.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

IWFS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		2.82%2.97%2.96%3.02%2.54%2.60%2.84%2.70%2.99%3.51%3.45%4.75%
IWFS.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IWFS.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWFS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWFS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

IWFS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. IWFS.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWFS.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFS.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer