PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWFQ.L is traded in GBp, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


IWFQ.L

1D
0.95%
1M
3.22%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.62%
1Y
22.16%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
13.14%

PRWU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IWFQ.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
8.70%7.40%18.93%19.15%2.78%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%20.63%18.25%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFQ.L and PRWU.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.63

The correlation between IWFQ.L and PRWU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWFQ.L
PRWU.L

Technology

32.2%
27.0%

Financial Services

14.1%
15.8%

Industrials

9.8%
9.9%

Healthcare

9.4%
10.7%

Communication Services

9.1%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
6.1%

Energy

4.2%
4.0%

Basic Materials

3.3%
3.2%

Utilities

2.5%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.1%

Technology

IWFQ.L
32.2%
PRWU.L
27.0%

Financial Services

IWFQ.L
14.1%
PRWU.L
15.8%

Industrials

IWFQ.L
9.8%
PRWU.L
9.9%

Healthcare

IWFQ.L
9.4%
PRWU.L
10.7%

Communication Services

IWFQ.L
9.1%
PRWU.L
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IWFQ.L
8.8%
PRWU.L
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

IWFQ.L
5.1%
PRWU.L
6.1%

Energy

IWFQ.L
4.2%
PRWU.L
4.0%

Basic Materials

IWFQ.L
3.3%
PRWU.L
3.2%

Utilities

IWFQ.L
2.5%
PRWU.L
2.7%

Real Estate

IWFQ.L
1.7%
PRWU.L
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFQ.L
IWFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWFQ.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFQ.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

Drawdowns

IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFQ.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

Volatility

IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWFQ.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.35%

IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFQ.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWFQ.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFQ.L nor PRWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IWFQ.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFQ.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWFQ.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFQ.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer