PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFQ.L vs. MWMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWFQ.L vs. MWMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund (MWMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWFQ.L is traded in GBp, while MWMIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MWMIX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFQ.L achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than MWMIX's -0.64% return.


IWFQ.L

1D
0.95%
1M
4.62%
YTD
8.70%
6M
9.17%
1Y
22.15%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
13.14%

MWMIX

1D
-1.05%
1M
3.58%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
15.49%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFQ.L vs. MWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWFQ.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
8.70%7.40%18.93%19.15%-9.55%25.17%10.93%25.86%-2.34%-0.33%
MWMIX
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund
-0.64%5.10%12.23%18.94%-3.17%25.29%10.79%29.72%4.35%-1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFQ.L and MWMIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2017

0.52

The correlation between IWFQ.L and MWMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWFQ.L vs. MWMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFQ.L
IWFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MWMIX
MWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFQ.L vs. MWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund (MWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWFQ.LMWMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.20

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.35

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

3.72

+9.55

IWFQ.L vs. MWMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the MWMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFQ.L and MWMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFQ.LMWMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

1.19

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.46

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.58

+0.31

Drawdowns

IWFQ.L vs. MWMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, smaller than the maximum MWMIX drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFQ.L and MWMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFQ.LMWMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.91%

-25.93%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-11.63%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

-22.97%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-22.97%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.04%

+5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-4.23%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

4.22%

-2.55%

Volatility

IWFQ.L vs. MWMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) is 2.56%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund (MWMIX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that IWFQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWFQ.LMWMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

3.50%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

9.49%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

13.31%

-3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

17.45%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.35%

19.91%

-5.56%

IWFQ.L vs. MWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFQ.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MWMIX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWFQ.L vs. MWMIX - Dividend Comparison

IWFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.60%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWFQ.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MWMIX
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Fund
12.60%12.47%10.34%0.77%11.44%13.44%8.22%10.84%9.48%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWFQ.L and MWMIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFQ.L and MWMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer