IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

IWFM.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)) and MOAT.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWFM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index, while MOAT.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWFM.L returned 16.24%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for MOAT.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWFM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MOAT.L.

Performance

IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IWFM.L is traded in GBp, while MOAT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MOAT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFM.L achieves a 19.59% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT.L's -2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, IWFM.L has outperformed MOAT.L with an annualized return of 16.24%, while MOAT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.45% annualized return.

IWFM.L

• 1D: -2.08%
• 1M: 4.79%
• YTD: 19.59%
• 6M: 19.86%
• 1Y: 32.08%
• 3Y*: 25.36%
• 5Y*: 14.35%
• 10Y*: 16.24%

MOAT.L

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: -2.54%
• 6M: -4.03%
• 1Y: 8.48%
• 3Y*: 5.28%
• 5Y*: 4.24%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWFM.L iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)	19.59%	12.72%	32.62%	5.85%	-8.21%	15.58%	24.16%	23.25%	1.62%	20.40%
MOAT.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF	-2.54%	-0.31%	13.06%	12.45%	-9.03%	26.72%	10.28%	28.69%	4.20%	11.92%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFM.L and MOAT.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2015	0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between IWFM.L and MOAT.L has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWFM.L	MOAT.L
Technology	26.0%	24.3%
Industrials	18.7%	8.8%
Financial Services	13.1%	7.4%
Healthcare	10.7%	23.2%
Energy	10.6%	-
Communication Services	6.8%	6.2%
Basic Materials	6.0%	4.2%
Utilities	3.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.6%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	18.1%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.5%

Return for Risk

IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFM.L

IWFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IWFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IWFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
IWFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IWFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

MOAT.L

MOAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 18
MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MOAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MOAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
MOAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
MOAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWFM.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	0.68	+1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	1.08	+1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.12	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	0.84	+2.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.94	1.98	+11.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFM.L and MOAT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWFM.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	0.68	+1.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.27	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.68	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.75	-0.25

Drawdowns

IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFM.L drawdown since its inception was -41.86%, which is greater than MOAT.L's maximum drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFM.L and MOAT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFM.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.86%	-25.07%	-16.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.95%	-10.93%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.15%	-23.01%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.15%	-23.01%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.58%	-25.07%	+2.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.92%	-6.92%	+4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-4.45%	-4.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	4.63%	-2.33%

Volatility

IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that IWFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWFM.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	3.58%	+2.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.94%	9.68%	+4.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.36%	13.48%	+2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.55%	15.60%	+5.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.58%	16.93%	+2.65%

IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFM.L vs. MOAT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFM.L nor MOAT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWFM.L and MOAT.L in my portfolio?

IWFM.L and MOAT.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWFM.L or MOAT.L?

On fees, IWFM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWFM.L or MOAT.L?

IWFM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOAT.L.

What is the main difference between IWFM.L and MOAT.L?

IWFM.L is categorized as Momentum, while MOAT.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. IWFM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while MOAT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWFM.L and 0.49% for MOAT.L.