PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFM.L vs. COO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWFM.L vs. COO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWFM.L is traded in GBp, while COO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFM.L achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than COO's -17.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IWFM.L has outperformed COO with an annualized return of 16.44%, while COO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.95% annualized return.


IWFM.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
6.96%
YTD
22.13%
6M
22.40%
1Y
34.99%
3Y*
26.24%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
16.44%

COO

1D
9.26%
1M
12.27%
YTD
-17.01%
6M
-17.33%
1Y
-3.74%
3Y*
-10.73%
5Y*
-5.62%
10Y*
5.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFM.L vs. COO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
22.13%12.72%32.62%5.85%-8.21%15.58%24.16%23.25%1.62%20.40%
COO
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
-17.01%-17.20%-1.14%8.74%-11.67%16.42%9.78%21.47%23.76%13.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFM.L and COO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014

0.25

The correlation between IWFM.L and COO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWFM.L vs. COO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFM.L
IWFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

COO
COO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
COO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
COO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
COO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
COO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFM.L vs. COO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) and The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWFM.LCOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.00

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

-0.12

+4.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.27

-0.31

+15.58

IWFM.L vs. COO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the COO Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFM.L and COO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFM.LCOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

-0.12

+2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

-0.20

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.21

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.36

+0.61

Drawdowns

IWFM.L vs. COO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFM.L drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, smaller than the maximum COO drawdown of -72.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFM.L and COO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFM.LCOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-72.88%

+50.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-30.76%

+21.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-48.53%

+28.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-48.53%

+28.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.58%

-48.53%

+25.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-40.06%

+39.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-13.64%

+8.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

12.08%

-9.78%

Volatility

IWFM.L vs. COO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) is 5.85%, while The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that IWFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWFM.LCOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

11.12%

-5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

19.65%

-5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

30.65%

-14.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

27.87%

-11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

27.81%

-10.63%

Dividends

IWFM.L vs. COO - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFM.L nor COO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COO
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.04%
IWFM.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWFM.L and COO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFM.L and COO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer