COO vs. SCHG
COO (The Cooper Companies, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, COO returned 5.16%/yr vs 18.63%/yr for SCHG. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
COO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COO achieves a -16.02% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, COO has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 5.16%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.63% annualized return.
COO
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- -16.02%
- 6M
- -16.64%
- 1Y
- -2.96%
- 3Y*
- -9.61%
- 5Y*
- -7.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.16%
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
COO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COO The Cooper Companies, Inc. | -16.02% | -10.85% | -2.83% | 14.47% | -21.06% | 15.33% | 13.10% | 26.27% | 16.84% | 24.59% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.23% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between COO and SCHG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between COO and SCHG has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
COO
SCHG
COO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.18 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 0.98 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 3.19 | -3.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COO drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COO and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.88% | -34.59% | -64.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.05% | -16.41% | -13.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.97% | -23.39% | -23.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.24% | -34.59% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.24% | -34.59% | -13.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.59% | -6.57% | -33.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -5.20% | -35.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.12% | 5.03% | +8.09% |
Volatility
COO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) has a higher volatility of 11.41% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.90%. This indicates that COO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.41% | 5.90% | +5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.79% | 12.46% | +6.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.72% | 16.21% | +14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.24% | 22.38% | +6.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 21.58% | +6.32% |
Dividends
COO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
COO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COO The Cooper Companies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COO and SCHG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COO has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to SCHG (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COO dropped -98.88% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COO and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer