PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWDP.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP) and BCOG.L (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWDP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while BCOG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWDP.L returned 1.76%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for BCOG.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWDP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BCOG.L.

Performance

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDP.L achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly lower than BCOG.L's 24.98% return.

IWDP.L

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
6.86%
6M
7.06%
1Y
11.51%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
3.99%

BCOG.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
24.98%
6M
23.49%
1Y
38.11%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWDP.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP		6.86%1.71%1.22%4.00%-14.93%26.93%-12.50%17.31%-0.09%1.72%
BCOG.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF		24.98%8.16%6.13%-12.32%29.36%29.04%-6.24%1.82%-4.64%1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IWDP.L and BCOG.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017

0.16

The correlation between IWDP.L and BCOG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWDP.L
BCOG.L

Real Estate

100.0%
5.8%

Financial Services

0.1%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
12.9%

Basic Materials

-

35.8%

Communication Services

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.7%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

5.6%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

IWDP.L
100.0%
BCOG.L
5.8%

Financial Services

IWDP.L
0.1%
BCOG.L
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IWDP.L
0.0%
BCOG.L
12.9%

Basic Materials

IWDP.L

-

BCOG.L
35.8%

Communication Services

IWDP.L

-

BCOG.L
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

IWDP.L

-

BCOG.L
9.7%

Energy

IWDP.L

-

BCOG.L

-

Healthcare

IWDP.L

-

BCOG.L

-

Industrials

IWDP.L

-

BCOG.L

-

Technology

IWDP.L

-

BCOG.L
5.6%

Utilities

IWDP.L

-

BCOG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP

L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF

Often compared with IWDP.L:
IWDP.L vs. TRET.DEIWDP.L vs. IUSP.LIWDP.L vs. VNQIWDP.L vs. HPRO.LIWDP.L vs. BIRDXIWDP.L vs. BBOX.LIWDP.L vs. ZPRP.DE
Often compared with BCOG.L:
BCOG.L vs. CMOP.LBCOG.L vs. GSGBCOG.L vs. CMFP.LBCOG.L vs. REGB.LBCOG.L vs. VUSA.LBCOG.L vs. CMOD.LBCOG.L vs. COMX.L

Return for Risk

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWDP.L
IWDP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IWDP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
BCOG.L
BCOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWDP.LBCOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.05
2.05

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.55
2.56

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

4.43

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

10.23

-6.10

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWDP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWDP.L and BCOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWDP.LBCOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.05

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.74

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.49

-0.23

Drawdowns

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDP.L drawdown since its inception was -58.29%, which is greater than BCOG.L's maximum drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDP.L and BCOG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWDP.LBCOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.29%

-28.15%

-30.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-8.57%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.50%

-14.48%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.31%

-27.76%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.66%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-5.16%

+1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-11.67%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.72%

-0.94%

Volatility

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) is 3.00%, while L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that IWDP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWDP.LBCOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

6.06%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

15.89%

-7.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

18.51%

-7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

16.89%

-3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

15.71%

-0.17%

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWDP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BCOG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWDP.L vs. BCOG.L - Dividend Comparison

IWDP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, while BCOG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCOG.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWDP.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP		3.03%3.13%3.17%3.14%3.56%2.17%3.11%3.03%3.82%3.05%2.96%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

IWDP.L and BCOG.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCOG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCOG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.L.

IWDP.L is categorized as REIT, while BCOG.L is Commodities. IWDP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while BCOG.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IWDP.L and 0.15% for BCOG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWDP.L and BCOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer